Home Home The Battle Over Tucker’s Fuentes Interview

The Battle Over Tucker’s Fuentes Interview

11
1300

Tucker Carlson’s interview with radical Nick Fuentes upset a lot of people, mostly because of what was said, but also because they saw Tucker as embracing Fuentes. They say he gave him a softball interview. I haven’t listened to it.

Erick Erickson wrote a piece in The Free Press and said:

Tucker Carlson suggested Hamas had been mischaracterized, and that it really was not a terrorist organization. I know Nick Fuentes spread conspiracy theories about the barbarism; I know Tucker Carlson has elevated people sympathetic to Hitler’s case for World War II; I know after Charlie Kirk was murdered, and after a transgender shooter opened fire on schoolchildren at Annunciation Catholic Church, loud voices on the right immediately turned around and blamed the Jews.

Erickson thinks it’s “the moral rot eating the American right.” I think Erick has gone too far. He’s never been supportive of conservatives although he says he is conservative. It’s an extreme reaction.

He was angry with JD Vance and Kevin Roberts for defending their friend Tucker. They are loyal, but Roberts went further, criticizing people who didn’t like what they said during the Fuentes interview.

Kevin Roberts of Heritage came out in support of Tucker and said Heritage will “always defend our friends against the slander who serve someone else’s agenda. That includes Tucker Carlson…the venomous coalition attacking him are sowing division…”

He appears to be referring to Evangelicals who make up a large part of the Republican Party and Trump supporters.

Tucker can interview anyone he wants. He’s a strong advocate of free speech. However, comments that were made upset a lot of people. People are afraid Tucker is mainstreaming Fuentes. Personally, I can’t stand Fuentes and his groypers or whatever they are called, and don’t think he’s now mainstreamed.

Common Sense Response

There was a lot of backlash. I think Will Chamberlain’s comments in the audio below were reasonable. Listen to this short clip where he speaks about the issue on the Pete Kaliner show.

Leave your comments below. Please be kind. I know this topic has people upset.

Previous articleWarning, Graphic: The Horror and Slaughter in Sudan
Next articleExplosion in Harvard Medical School, Looks Like Arson

11 COMMENTS

  1. These Two men had a respectful conversation with each other. They had areas of agreement, and areas of disagreement. The entire conversation was interesting, and engaging. These men have their opinions, and are entitled to their individual beliefs without scoren, or ridicule from others. They did not promote violence, or hatred against anyone. They spoke calmly, rationally about issues they feel passionate about. Calls to censor, or cancel these men are uncalled for. The people who are calling for such measures are the people who are promoting censorship, cancellation, hate, and violence. Simply for disliking a conversation that they disagree with.

  2. Fuentes has an enormous following especially with young people and minorities….strange because he’s a “racist” lol…and that scares the daylights out of the cabal. Fuentes had the #1 show on Spotify until they took it down, Rogan was #3….that shows his depth.

    When he was young was pretty radical, but he has since matured and there is no better orator than Fuentes.

  3. This is the same thing we see over and over whenever someone of prominence does not take the position that Israel is always right. In this case we have 2 of those people participating in the interview.

    The cheap, childish attacks on Fuentes are standard. I have read lots of those attacks. I never see anyone attacking his positions on a basis of substance. I do see statements Fuentes made and makes which are incorrect and hasty, which could be attacked, but they are not. That shows the intention of the critics is not to discuss, it is to demonize.

  4. My only contention or perhaps uneasiness is the obsession of a Fuentes, Carlson, Greene and Owens with Israel. Yes, we understand your position, however it is now turning into a one trick pony with this being the only topic they are talking about. I am not asking them to stop discussing it but the over-the-top quantity of time spent on it gives a perception of Antisemitism. I understand their qualms with AIPAC, however there are other groups that also try to exert their influence through lobby’s and lobbyists and from nations not even friendly toward the U.S. Iran-UAE etc., Carlson a few years back warned Pat Buchanan about his stance on Israel as being perceived as being Antisemitic.

    • Just the opposite, Fuentes has been railing on Israel for 8 years and predicted the mess that is occurring in the Middle East. It is others like Owens and Carlson who are jumping on HIS bandwagon because he was always right about Israel.

      Israel is the root of many of the world’s ills.

  5. I watched the 2 hour interview a couple days ago.

    To be honest I knew close to nothing about Fuentes.

    I had no reason to like or hate him, I knew close to nothing.

    I am not saying I agree with everything he said but to my surprise Fuentes is not the monster I had heard he was.

    But I don t know about the things he said in the past, maybe he said horrible things, I really don t know.

    But if he did not say very horrible things in the past then it seems he was a victim of the usual demonization that is done to anyone who is popular and leans right.

    The left and the MSM distort what one says and they convince millions of people you are a monster, they did it to Charlie Kirk, are doing it to Trump and it looks like they did it to Fuentes.

    He seems like an intelligent man, very articulate, very polite, very honest…but all I know of him is from that 2 hour interview…

    Maybe if I knew more I would have a different opinion…

    And for what this is worth, Tucker talked too much in that interview, not only interrupted Fuentes too often but talked way too much…it was annoying.

    • Fuentes is a smart young man. Of course he gets attacked by the very powerful Israeli lobby which permeates our USA. And there are lots of others who are gullible reject any criticism of Israel.

      Young men are going to be rash sometimes, but in general, I think his policy on Israel is correct.

Comments are closed.