President Trump torched the Wall Street Journal and Murdoch over the 2003 drawing they say Trump created for Epstein’s birthday. It was very bawdy.
Trump said today “I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his “pile of garbage” newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!!”
Not only didn’t the WSJ have the letter, Trump told them it was fake and he’d sue. They printed the article anyway.
Trump wrote last night, “The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn’t print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I’m going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DJT.”
I hope Murdoch has a spare $700 million handy.
According to Karoline Leavitt, the President wanted to see the letter and they had to admit they didn’t even have the letter in their possession.
How dumb can a publication be. It is very difficult for a famous figure to sue for libel; they need to show evil intentions. If I were on a jury, the fact they publish and can’t produce the letter or even a photo of it would be enough for me to decide in Trump’s favor. This is spiteful, egregious behavor; they lowest form of Yellow Journalism. I big fine might make editors a little more exacting on what evidence they depend on to make accusations that carry a heavy burden of public condemnation on the subject of the hit peice.
‘Awaiting approval’? Seriously? There is a reason I don’t waste my time here. This would be one such example.
The WSJ is the paper of record for the globalist elites. I predict it will crash and burn in the coming days. That is why we cannot allow ourselves to become a ‘one issue’ party. All of it matters, and people need to realize that the Epstein issue will absolutely see it’s day in court.
The WSJ is adopting Adam Schiff SOP.
If there was anything bad about Trump in those files, that would have been the lawfare strategy.
Who at the WSJ lost their mind?
The ENTIRE ‘legacy’ has…very bad cases of TDS in that arena…One has to remember that their divorce with the Fourth Estate/Journalism, some fifty years ago, and subsequent ‘shacking up’ with the Fifth Column/propagandists that the present outcome was unavoidable…
Comments are closed.