There is a solution to the judicial tyrants affecting our President’s immigration policies. Apparently, the situation isn’t unusual. Former counsel to Mitch McConnell, Mike Fragoso, said that during the Bush administration, a 90,000-person influx of Haitian boat people poured into the country. A New York judge kept enjoining the Coast Guard as it sent Haitians home.
Then-attorney general Bill Barr went to the Supreme Court, and they stepped in. The Court lifted the stay twice. Then the judge slapped a third stay, claiming they were violating the High Seas Act.
The judge planned to enjoin the United States military forces. The backup plan was to blockade Haiti because you can’t be enjoined for violating international law.
However, it would have violated international law. Ken Starr was concerned that going to Court a third time would have exhausted their patience. He was ordered to go and get the stay.
Ken Starr got the third stay. Additionally, the Court decided to stop the shenanigans and took away the district court’s jurisdiction.
That’s the solution.
Newt Gingrich suggested this last night on Life, Liberty, and Levin – take away their jurisdiction.
During the first Bush administration, they were dealing with an influx of Haitian boat people. Something like 90,000 of them (seems quaint now). Well, a judge in Brooklyn (I think) kept enjoining the Coast Guard as it picked up Haitians and sent them home. AG Barr went straight… pic.twitter.com/xD9elbHObW
— Mike Fragoso (@mike_frags) March 16, 2025
President Trump’s Senior Advisor Stephen Miller Has Had Enough
Stephen Miller says, “If a district court judge can be involved in the conduct of foreign policy, under no definition do we have a democracy in this country. If we get into a place in this country where district court judges could interfere and direct which General on the battlefield is going to be in charge of making which decisions? Could direct where we can send this military asset to this country, but not this country? Could direct what intelligence we could share with Israel versus with Saudi Arabia?”
“I mean, you know, not to get too philosophical, but for a long time in this country, its power has been concentrated principally in two areas, the unelected bureaucracy and the unelected judiciary.”
“And power has been increasingly concentrated in these two areas. And in the case of the hard left, the judiciary takes steps to protect the bureaucracy, further shrinks the circle in which democracy is occurring.”
“This is really fundamentally about democracy. The American people said to get these terrorist gangs the H*LL out of our country, the president has plenary authority under the constitution, under the Alien Enemies Act, under core Article 2 powers to achieve that.”
“And no district court judge who presides over some small, like, little geography of the whole country could possibly presume to have the authority to direct the expulsion of terrorists from our soil, who, by the way, are also here illegally.”
STEPHEN MILLER GOES OFF ON ROGUE JUDGES: “If a district court judge can be involved in the conduct of foreign policy, under no definition do we have a democracy in this country.
“If we get into a place in this country where district court judges could interfere and direct… pic.twitter.com/2WJo3Eerie
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 17, 2025
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
get rid of robe-chimp assholes today
Why ‘elect’ a Commander in Chief’ if he can be ‘overruled’ by petty, biased nincompoops whose only claim to fame is their utter ignorance…
AMEN. And then there’s treason, which is more and more evident across the judiciary and its leftist purchasers.
I thought Trump is already working on that, taking away the jurisdiction, with a case on Article II, which the USSC is hesitant to step in on. It’s hard to say if Roberts and Barrett would side with the Constitution. I do not see Gingrich offering anything original here. (He is only a historian.)
I see that Barr was willing to do some real work protecting America when Bush was president, but not when Trump was president.
Is Bondi capable of, and willing to, step in on this situation? How about just letting the solicitor general handle it for Trump?
Yesterday in court, Bondi’s DOJ conceded to Boasberg that it would follow his illegal orders, just not after the planes were out of the USA. That is a very bad signal. So, she dropped the Article II issue in court. How about Newt comment on that?
Quick answer. Gingrich is useless/dangerous and always has been; all air no ground game. Barr was just as much Deep State as Bush, and that is why they worked well together. Bondi is NOT capable, and demonstrates the jelly spinal structure she did as FL AJ in the Trayvon Martin case. I shuddered when she was chosen, but I pray DJT has his reasons to expose her to the sunshine of reality, which is already occurring. Gaetz was framed by the Globalists – as has long since been proven – the minute he started to grow cojones in Congress.
The Democrat Party is the Organization of the Enemy Domestic .