The corruption that is being exposed seems to have taken politicians by surprise, which is as stunning as the information. USAID has been corrupt for a long time, and now Democrats are forced to defend the most corrupt agency/department in the government.
Wikileaks posted a stunning email from 2010 on X. In the email, Cheryl Mills, a Clinton apparatchik, responded to Rajiv Shah. In it she says, “USAID is nothing more than a slush fund for the State Department to as they please.”
“USAID is supposed to do basic development… . we[sic] are overcharged and not served by the Department, and we are bullied overseas by the Department of State and by your meaningless exhortations, so poorly done in the last two months only make you look like the puppet you are.”
The Bottomless Purse and No Oversight
We are also finding out that the Founding Fathers were right when they warned against the State having unlimited funds and no oversight. People with power give the money to their friends and allies who will support them in their quest for power.
We learned that USAID controlled a great deal of the news globally. One of the worst was the secretive Internews Network, receiving nearly half a billion dollars from USAID. Wikileaks described what Internews does:
USAID has pushed nearly half a billion dollars ($472.6m) through a secretive US government-financed NGO, “Internews Network” (IN), which has “worked with” 4,291 media outlets, producing in one year 4,799 hours of broadcasts reaching up to 778 million people and “training” over 9000 journalists (2023 figures).
IN has also supported social media censorship initiatives. The operation claims “offices” in over 30 countries, including main offices in US, London, Paris and regional HQs in Kiev, Bangkok and Nairobi.
The Clinton Global Initiative Scam
It is headed up by Jeanne Bourgault, who pays herself $451k a year. Bourgault worked out of the US embassy in Moscow during the early 1990s, where she was in charge of a $250m budget, and in other revolts or conflicts at critical times, before formally rotating out of six years at USAID to IN. Bourgault’s IN bio and those of its other key people and board members have been recently scrubbed from its website but remain accessible at http://archive.org.
Records show the board being co-chaired by Democrat securocrat Richard J. Kessler and Simone Otus Coxe, wife of NVIDIA billionaire Trench Coxe, both major Democratic donors. In 2023, supported by Hillary Clinton, Bourgault launched a $10m IN fund at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI).
The IN page showing a picture of Bourgault at the CGI has also been deleted. IN has at least six captive subsidiaries under unrelated names including one based out of the Cayman Islands. Since 2008, when electronic records begin, more than 95% of IN’s budget has been supplied by the US government (thread follows).
Removed Internews Network (IN) page of its chief executive Jeanne Bourgault at the Clinton Global Initiative (2023) pic.twitter.com/hKInv2i9m2
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 8, 2025
Bourgault and Clinton
Jeanne Bourgault is radical and tries to censor any information that opposes their agenda. Does anyone remember how Clinton pushed for the Citizens United v. FEC lawsuit because they were showing a film exposing her corruption? It was a protected speech case. She also tried to push criticism of Islam as blasphemy on us.
3/Jeanne Bourgalt is CEO, pulling a salary of $400,000 and promoted at the World Economic Forum (2024) the development of “exclusion lists” to pressure advertisers to fund “good news & information” in order to deal with “disinformation”. pic.twitter.com/U6N8zFPu8s
— Hank Miiller (@miiller) February 8, 2025
Here’s Bourgault pushing inclusion and exclusion speech lists.
Jeanne Bourgault with her $396,508 salary is also VERY busy fighting DISINFORMATION at Davos World Economic Forum, calling to build “inclusion and exclusion lists” to pressure advertisers funding bad content. Didn’t coordination with advertisers try to kill @elonmusk and @X?… pic.twitter.com/DYEV8qycLt
— Broken Anthem (@BrokenAnthemUSA) February 7, 2025
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
If were lucky, Bondi MIGHT sue someone. More likely she’ll just go on Hannity to THREATEN to sue someone. She’s really a disappointment. Why hasn’t she indicted anyone at USAID…FEC…or done ANYTHING about Engelmayer? WTF? Even Jeff Sessions would have done something by now…
Hillary for prison.
“
I’ve thought for a long time and said Government is nothing but a money-laundering, bribery and extortion racket. I based this on small scraps of data not knowing how pervasive it all is. We have learned in mere weeks how big the racket truly is. So when leftists, judges included, raise holy hell about individuals privacy with government records we can rightly assume a great many are worried the “gravy train is over” and maybe even more repercussions.
Furthermore: We should start investigating the big donors to politicians and political parties. We do know how some are benefiting, such as climate agenda failures, and surely it goes well beyond that. There has to be a reason that billions are donated. It certainly isn’t for some altruistic reasons; which some will claim as “saving democracy”. It’s obviously they have a perverted sense of democracy.
I read where Sen. Cotton was proposing legislation to require Presidents to divest their holding. For someone like Trump, that would be nearly impossible to liquidate all his holdings. It makes me suspicious of his purpose. The Congress has the power of the purse and we see all they can accomplish is ever increasing omnibus legislation, and come to find out are illegally spending moneys. We surely can’t trust Democrats and, unfortunately, the Republicans aren’t much better.
And we wonder why, with such wonderful ‘pro-USA effort” for nearly$ 500, the Russians and Cheese are making considerable gains in many of the countries blessed by the effort? Of course why would we think we would get much bang for our buck with the top executives only making like $400,000? And how many million was Chelsea Clinton’s take?
I saw numbers about the “charity” Chelsea runs, I don’ t remember the source, but I hope the numbers are real, someone calculated how much they spent and how many meals were served to poor people, it came to $1140 per meal !!!…..
We all know the cost per meal was probably something like 10 or maybe $ 25 at most, which means the rest of the money was pocketed by Chelsea and maybe a few accomplices…..
And that is how over 90% of democrats become rich, they run scams that no one bothers to verify, to audit….until Trump came along…..