Without Any Evidence, MSM Blows Up No-Never-Mind Signal Chat -Update

9
198

Update: The Yeshiva World News released texts from the Signal Chat, which don’t exactly show war plans but real-time or near real-time activity in Sanaa. However, Hegseth stated when the drone strikes would occur and when the F-18s would launch without details.

The Houthis obviously weren’t on this thread.

The problem isn’t that this elite group was getting the information—it wasn’t public information—but that someone put a vicious far-left reporter on the thread.

Shawn Farash said on X:

There’s nothing in it but the pros and cons of striking now vs waiting a month.

It’s not war plans. It’s not classified info.

It’s a conversation, and nice to see cabinet members and staffers hashing out the best way to move forward.

We need to find out who put Goldberg on this thread. It has to be a mole or just a dumb move. Again, this was not shared publicly, but Goldberg made it public. So, is he allowed to reveal this information?

It seems likely they will have to give up Signal.

Original Story

The media is going bonkers over what Donald Trump called a glitch that allowed Trump and GOP hater Jeffrey Goldberg in on a Signal chat he claims included war plans.

Goldberg is the editor of the far-far-left rag, the Atlantic. He was the tall tale teller of the Russiagate hoax and came up with the suckers and losers lie. Goldberg dedicates his every waking moment to destroying Republicans, especially Donald Trump.

Because of his claim that he heard war plans, the media is running wild and demanding the firing of DoD Secretary Hegseth. Democrats and their media want to use this to improve their abysmal polling.

FangFang’s boyfriend posted this on X:

Why didn’t Swalwell resign after sleeping with the enemy while serving on a sensitive intelligence committee and a CIA subcommittee?

Democrats are trying to make this the crisis of the century.

So, why doesn’t Jeffrey Goldberg give us some evidence?

He’s Walking It Back

DNI Gabbard, DoD Hegseth, CIA head Ratcliffe all say they weren’t war plans.

Who added Goldberg? He’s clearly trying to take down the administration. It was stupid, or it was deliberately damaging. It is also clear that Goldberg presented no evidence. Given his history of lying, we shouldn’t believe a word he says without proof.


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg
Greg
2 months ago

18 USC 793(e)

(e)Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

I’d say Goldberg pretty much admitted his guilt. Since Democrats are wanting repercussions than look no further than the real guilty party.

Last edited 2 months ago by Greg
Anonymous
Anonymous
2 months ago
Reply to  Greg

Gaol the bugger. He should have hung up and/or advised the parties involved that he was inadvertently ‘included’. Ignorance of the law is NO excuse…

Greg
Greg
2 months ago

One item of note is the confirmed ID of the man entering his girlfriend’s house. This capability goes back to the Yom Kippur war.

Greg
Greg
2 months ago

Good Lawgic brought up 18 USC 793(e) which could land Goldberg in jail for 10 years.

Anonymous
Anonymous
2 months ago

Lets get this straight: Traitor Democrat federal workers have been leaking critical information to the press for decades and Dems cheer about it. Then a Democrat trespasses into a live communications he KNOWS he’s illegally trespassing in, and the Dems are screaming about the leak? Just because you don’t physically create the wiretap doesn’t mean youre not breaking federal wiretap laws when you find a way to listen in and you do so.

Anonymous
Anonymous
2 months ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Do not forget the guy ( a GENERAL no less) who was ready to ‘warn’ his Chinese counterpart of any US actions that may come to his knowledge concerning the US Military that would be ‘unfavourable’ to China. Thought THAT WAS treason????