Birth tourism — also called maternal or pregnancy tourism — involves traveling to another country specifically to give birth so the child can obtain citizenship by birthplace (jus soli). Popular destinations include the United States, Canada, Mexico, Portugal, Turkey, the UAE, and Hong Kong, each offering different legal frameworks, healthcare quality, and post-birth opportunities. A child born on U.S. soil is a U.S. citizen and, at age 21, can bring his or her parents to the U.S. We are looking at 1.5 million of these babies in China. There are at least 500 CCP birth tourism companies, and Chief Justice Roberts said it has no bearing on the legal analysis.
Most people taking advantage are the elites, the wealthy of other nations, including enemy nations, who want to change us from within.
Researcher and author Peter Schweizer reported in January that China supercharged ‘birth tourism’ and scammed American citizenship for up to 1.5 million babies.
Chinese officials estimate that the number is a staggering 50,000 of their own citizens per year. Scholars who have studied the subject in depth, like Australia-based professor Salvator Babones, put the figure even higher, perhaps twice that.
“With up to 100,000 Chinese babies being born to US citizens every year,” he writes, “birth tourism may result in millions of new elite Chinese-Americans.”
Chinese birth tourism in the United States has been practiced for decades, but it has especially flourished in the past 15 years.
That means at least 750,000 and possibly as many as 1.5 million Chinese, who are also American citizens by virtue of being born here, are now growing toward adulthood in China.
Unfortunately, the Chinese Communists are not our friends.
More than 70% of the newborns in Saipan are born to Chinese birth-tourist parents who use the territory’s 45-day visa-free visitation rules and the “Covenant of the Northern Mariana Islands” to ensure their children will have American citizenship.
The Skeptics
Given the disaster this is for the U.S., you would hope the Supreme Court would overturn this ruling that came into prominence in the ’80s when a left-wing justice snuck it into a footnote.
The three leftists on the Supreme Court are skeptical of Trump’s case, as are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney-Barrett.
The Birth Tourism Companies Don’t Matter
This morning, Justice Roberts said the 500 birth tourism companies don’t matter at all. [via Eric Daugherty]
SCOTUS Justice John Roberts is VERY skeptical of President Trump ending birthright citizenship, repeatedly firing back at Trump’s top lawyer. This would mean we require Amy Coney Barrett for a shot at 5-4.
SAUER: China has 500 birth tourism companies to bring people here to give birth and return to our nation!
ROBERTS: That has no impact on the legal analysis…it’s a new world; it’s the same Constitution.
SAUER: It is, and as Justice Scalia says, you have a constitutional provision that should extend to reasonably comparable evils.
🚨 JUST IN: SCOTUS Justice John Roberts is VERY skeptical of President Trump ending birthright citizenship, repeatedly firing back at Trump’s top lawyer
This would mean we require Amy Coney Barrett for a shot at 5-4.
SAUER: China has 500 birth tourism companies to bring people… pic.twitter.com/3nB3KtIBUd
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 1, 2026
Amy Coney-Barrett was also skeptical.
“I can imagine it being messy in some applications.”
“What if you don’t know who the parents are?