Socialist [Communist] Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York had a bizarre response to the decision Thursday by the Supreme Court against affirmative action in higher education.
Ocasio-Cortez, along with other angry leftists, raged against the decision. Her interpretations were strange.
“If SCOTUS was serious about their ludicrous ‘colorblindness’ claims, they would have abolished legacy admissions, aka affirmative action for the privileged,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted.
If SCOTUS was serious about their ludicrous “colorblindness” claims, they would have abolished legacy admissions, aka affirmative action for the privileged.
70% of Harvard’s legacy applicants are white. SCOTUS didn’t touch that – which would have impacted them and their patrons.
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 29, 2023
“70% of Harvard’s legacy applicants are white. SCOTUS didn’t touch that – which would have impacted them and their patrons,” she added.
That’s an absolutely ridiculous thing to say. Legacy admissions were not before the Supreme Court. How could they vote on it? They didn’t touch it because it wasn’t there. Maybe she thought they could willy-nilly, pick another issue to consider. In any case, legacy admission does not fall under the Constitution. Racism does.
She says the dumbest things.
Additionally, the census bureau notes that the white population of the United States is 75.5%. Can this woman do math? The US is predominantly white, Alexandria.
Also, the students who were admitted to Harvard would have to have terrific scores if they weren’t affirmative action.
Democrats are making satire come true.
Democrats Devastated As Supreme Court Bans Racism https://t.co/V6alZVuiQ4 pic.twitter.com/61w047mxkj
— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) June 29, 2023
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
I would strongly dispute the claim that 70% of the Harvard admissions are going to Whites. I’d say, lets break down that 70% statistic and separate the number of Whites and the number of Jewish enrollments and I would guarantee that the percentage of Whites would drop drastically.
I mean, get real. The entire purpose of Affirmative Action, from it’s inception, has been to enshrine into law a deliberate and malicious means to discriminate against White males, primarily, and to a slightly lesser degree, against White females. As for Asians – I would remind everyone that when these illegal and purposely discriminatory anti-White policies were first put into place – the percentage of Asians in America was extremely tiny, and did not begin to explode until that White race replacement legislation was enacted in 1965 (Hart-Celler Act).
I also find it outrageous that it wasn’t until Asians began to suffer from these Affirmative Action policies that a sufficient level of anger began to rise and then result in this recent Supreme Court decision to rule that these programs were a violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Equal Protection guarantees. For how many decades have the descendants of the White men who wrote the Constitution been specifically singled out and targeted for discrimination and we have not heard a peep of protest from previous Supreme Courts? Or, from most of the politicians in our Congress and from most of the stooges who have occupied the White House?
The ruling is far too late. Sandra O’Connor in 2003 ruled the bias was needed for 25 more years, justifying a suspension in fairness, doing great damage to America. She was a beneficiary of AA. Sex based discrimination is also rampant. This ruling has implications in corporations also, but we do not expect anyone in universities or corporations to rush out and try to be fair.
The EEOC violated its charter of fairness the moment it was created and unleashed a reign of terror which affected the entire society, directly violating its charter.
I think that this ruling came about because Roberts decided to act decent to obscure his many other bad rulings. Maybe his children will need to get into prestigious schools soon.
Discrimination at prestigious universities is rampant in favor of the wealthy and connected. Tucker covered it a few times. He cited examples such as the lack luster Cuomo boys getting into top schools and never demonstrating ability.
I don’t know if AOC is stupid, but she often has proved how ignorant she is, especially about USA history and its constitution. AT TIMES I WONDER IF SHE WAS EVEN A GOOD BAR-TENDER.
That’s a good point, I doubt she can be effective at anything. She is an aspiring senator.
I notice that AOC seems to not have any positions that would compel her to discriminate against White males when it comes time to decide who she chooses to go to bed with. I mean, if AOC had any real principles hardwired into her brain, wouldn’t she be sharing her bed with a Puerto Rican horn dog?
I also notice that at least one of Obongo’s daughters are also choosing to discriminate against their own race and opting for the opportunity to engage in a little hijacking of White European genes.
Gee whiz! I wonder how these disgruntled, white race hating minorities are able to justify their hypocrisy and square the hate that flows from their mouths with their decision to breed with a White European?
SCOTUS IS WOKE!………Q