The Supreme Court, trying to preserve the Constitution’s purity, might destroy it over birthright Citizenship.
Will Cain, Fox News Reporter
Will Cain said that “320K babies were born in 2023 to unauthorized or temporary immigrant mothers; that’s 9% of ALL U.S. births!” He added that the Court had better do the right thing.
Don’t count on it, Will.
BOOM! Will Cain just EXPOSED the birth tourism explosion
“320K babies born in 2023 to unauthorized or temporary immigrant mothers, that’s 9% of ALL U.S. births!”
SCOTUS better do the RIGHT THING and END birthright citizenship! pic.twitter.com/fX6yoRFIiX
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) April 1, 2026
Peter Schweizer, Researcher and Author
China’s birth tourism scammed the US for up to 1.5 million babies who will vote for Democrats when they hit 18 years of age.
Birthright citizenship is a matter of national security, and our rivals will seek to exploit it as long as it stands. Birth tourism must end, or American citizenship means nothing. pic.twitter.com/ykHf50ReX3
— Peter Schweizer (@peterschweizer) April 2, 2026
Ship of Fools
The Supreme Court justices didn’t seem to be moved by the oral arguments. Turley said it will have to be dealt with a constitutional amendment. However, he doesn’t know if the people have “the political will to wage that war, wage that fight.”
No one believes that the framers would have embraced what we have today.
“We have become the world’s Ship of Fools. I mean, you have China that is virtually mocking us. They have hundreds of these companies that solely arrange for Chinese citizens to give birth in the United States. It’s done in the open. And it’s making us into a laughing stock, but it has also robbed us of control over what it means to be a citizen in this country.
: “ ’ ”
Jonathan Turley just delivered one of the most devastating legal takedowns of birthright citizenship you will hear from a constitutional scholar — and he did it on Fox &… pic.twitter.com/o1VQled5aO
— M.A. Rothman (@MichaelARothman) April 2, 2026
It’s insane, Turley continues
“…the fact that we are one of the few countries that continues to embrace birthright citizenship is perfectly insane. And it is a great danger to this government and to this republic. So the question for these justices is not necessarily whether they agree with birthright citizenship. I expect the majority does not. But this is what I call my Supreme Court class, a default case. It’s when the record is messy. Where do the justices run home to?
“And what was really astonishing yesterday is that it appeared that we might have nine originalists on the court because the liberal justices started to channel Scalia and then to say, ‘Oh, you know, we’ve got to stick with the original intent here. ‘”
“These are justices; when they look at other rights, like the Second Amendment, they treat that language as barely a speed bump, and they say, “Well, we have to look at this living Constitution and the problems we’re facing today. Well, the problems we’re facing today on birthright citizenship are existential, in my view.”
NAILED IT: Jonathan Turley on birthright citizenship: “The fact that we are one of the few countries that continues to embrace birthright citizenship is perfectly INSANE, and it is a great danger to this government and to this republic… The problems we’re facing today on… pic.twitter.com/3qatPYoiCD
— RedWave Press (@RedWavePress) April 2, 2026