Final Arguments in Willis Hearing Set for March 1

5
209

Fulton County Superior Judge Scott McAfee has set a March 1 hearing date for final arguments on whether District Attorney Fani Willis should be disqualified from the election interference case against former President Donald Trump. She was allegedly having an affair with the prosecutor she appointed to take the case. Willis overpaid him, and both seemed to have guidance from the White House and J6 panel.

The hearing, which could see Ms. Willis replaced with a different prosecutor, is set for 1 p.m. and is expected to be live-streamed, as with most Fulton County proceedings.

As an aside, everyone ignores an important facet of this case. Willis and Wade were in contact with and probably guided by the White House and the J6 panel.

The Case

Ms. Willis testified before Judge McAfee on Feb. 15–16, where she faced heated questioning over her relationship with top prosecutor Nathan Wade amid allegations that Ms. Willis benefited financially from the relationship.

Her friend Robin Yeartie testified that, without a doubt, the relationship started in 2019 before Willis hired Wade. Another witness was scheduled to testify that the relationship had started in 2019, but he backed out.

Trump’s attorneys obtained the cell phone data of Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade. Unsurprisingly, it could prove that Wade and Fani Willis lied about when their relationship started.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis testified that her relationship with Nathan Wade began after he was appointed to get Trump. However, cell phone records prove he spent evenings at her residence before her investigation began. You can read about that here.

The Rebuttal

Trump’s attorneys submitted the cell phone evidence. Fani Willis’s rebuttal is that it isn’t “relevant.”

Criminal defense investigator Charles Mittelstadt wrote in an affidavit that Willis and Wade made more than 2,000 calls. They had just under 12,000 interactions during an 11-month period in 2021. He also analyzed Wade’s phone connection to cell towers near where Willis lived.

In a filing later on Friday, Willis asked the court to exclude Trump’s team’s filing, arguing that the records do not prove the content of communications between Willis and Wade, nor do they prove that either person was at a particular address.

Willis said, “The phone records simply do not prove anything relevant.”

“The records do nothing more than demonstrate that Special Prosecutor Wade’s telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, and other businesses are located,” the filing said.

The judge in the case, Judge McAfee, does not have to allow that into evidence. However, her rebuttal is another misdirection.

 


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jessie
Jessie
1 year ago

We know the justice system is corrupt and a joke, much like the law schools that produce the knaves we see everyday. The Dems will replace Wills with another corrupt moron who aspires to man the ovens to judge Trump.

Because you cannot reason with the Left, negotiate with them, trust them, or even compromise with them anymore than you can with a rabid skunk, we all know that the kangaroo court will go on. The toxic vomit and policies inflicted on the nation must be destroyed.

Papa
Papa
1 year ago
Reply to  Jessie

Right on! Tyrants willingly compromise (lie) to gain an inch toward their enslavement of their fellow man. They are masters of deceit in their efforts. Our nation’s leaders (many times) sold our citizens on compromise for the universal good.. (What a crock!) We (our leaders and fellow citizens) have practically compromised the complete demise of our nation. We pay the dollars in taxes to accomplish our own demise. But it’s not over till the fat lady sings; but she is drawing a breath to begin!

Canadian Friend
1 year ago

related,

I watched the 2 hour where Fani Willis is in the witness boot answering questions.

She is so dumb it boggles the mind !!!

when asked who paid for trips she began rambling on about the fact that in Napa they pair things, such as pairing champagne with chocolate and caviar…and she informed us that she prefers to drink Grey Goose

After she explained she went to Aruba and then later to the Bahamas, she was unable to understand the questions from the lawyer,
so she asked the lawyer to refer to the Aruba trip as the mama trip ( because Wade’s mother was present ) , and to refer to the Bahamas trip as the sister trip ( because her sister was present )

this is language you use when addressing a 5 year old !!!

when she said men act some way she pronouced act as AXE…which makes her sound very ignorant and educated and unrefined

when asked where the cash she keeps at home comes from she said and I quote ; ” cash is fungible”

She probably thinks using that word made her look refined and intelligent but it did not.

Fungible means ; replaceable, interchageable

in that context – in court, talking to a lawyer – saying her money was replaceable, interchangeable or “fungible” was dumb,
it confirmed she can not explain where it comes from, that she does not have the receipts…

it was pretty much an admission that that cash is not from her paycheck, it was pretty much an admission that something illegal is going on…that some of that cash might be bribes or money that she not have.

when the last Lawyer made her read the rules ( or ethical code or whatever it is called ) for people employed by Fulton justice system, and it said you cannot receive gifts that aggregate to over 100 dollars over a period of one year…

it was obvious she does not know what aggregate means…she kept saying that the gifts were EACH less than 100

she does not know that aggregate means all of them them together, the total of all the gifts at the end of the year.

the woman is like a child, you need to use simple language so she can follow, she has temper tantrums like a teenager ( she yelled at lawyers and wagged her finger at the judge )

she probably does not know the meaning of decorum because her behavior – for someone paid almost 300,000 a year and who is the district attorney- her behavior was low class and far from anything anyone would call decorum.

she disrespected the judge and the lawyers several times.

She is dumb, she is low class, she lies a lot

Unfortunately the judge came to her rescue I would say at least 40 times in those 2 hours; he constantly would stop lawyers from asking important questions…

the judge was obviously protecting Fani Willis

yet when she misbehaved several times and when she gave answers that were way too long and very far from the topic at hand,
the judge said nothing except two times where he very timidly very politely asked her to not do those things, and then she did them a dozen times again after that.

I am afraid that judge will rule in her favor or give her such a light sentence it will be a joke.

The judge was WAY too soft on her it was shocking.

Popeye the Project Boy
Popeye the Project Boy
1 year ago

Spot on Canadian Friend. Her behavior is the norm for most black women. I’ve delt with plenty of them over the years when I was a delivery driver on the eastside of Buffalo NY. They really are vicious!

Wade Be Sniffin Fanni's Butt ForCash
Wade Be Sniffin Fanni's Butt ForCash
1 year ago

These two anti-white connivers should be disbarred, have their assets taken from them and put into prison where they belong.