Trump’s Being Roundly Criticized for Calling Horrible Countries S***hole Countries

11

President Trump allegedly grew frustrated with lawmakers Thursday in the Oval Office when they suggested he restore protections for immigrants from Haiti, El Salvador and African countries as part of a bipartisan immigration deal, according to two people who received second-hand information.

“Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?” Trump said, according to these people, referring to African countries and Haiti. He then suggested that the United States should instead bring more people from countries like Norway, whose prime minister he met yesterday.

Good point! It’s not about the race of the people, it’s fact that the leaders of the country have abused their people and engaged in profiteering and corruption. Politically, the countries are mostly socialist and therein lies the biggest problem.

We agree with the consensus that he should watch what he says but he didn’t say it for public consumption.

Let’s face it, he’s right.

Have the people who criticized the President been to those countries? The people aren’t the country but their leaders have indeed destroyed the countries. If we take too many people from these cultures, there is the danger of them not assimilating and in turn transforming our culture.

The President isn’t careful about his verbiage, he’s not PC, but there is a point in this if we are honest. Norway is a peaceful, developed country and Haiti, El Salvador and African countries are basically not. It has nothing to do with the color of peoples’ skin. It’s just the truth. They are impoverished, drug-infested ratholes.

Why should we keep looking for excuses to open the borders to more and more people, especially since we can demand the best and haven’t cured our own issues or poor minority Americans?

We can answer that. The reason is because the Democrats want pliable people who are uneducated and who come from leftist nations.

We don’t even know if the President said it but it’s being reported as face.

Sens. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) proposed cutting the visa lottery program by 50 percent and then prioritizing countries already in the system, a White House official said.

Wrong! The lottery needs to be gone or the next Democrat or RINO in the presidency will expand it once again.

They want to only add $1.5 billion for the wall which is almost meaningless.

To Trump’s credit, amnesty Graham and Durbin thought they would be meeting with Trump alone and were surprised to find immigration conservatives such as Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), at the meeting.

After the meeting, Marc Short, Trump’s legislative aide, said the White House was nowhere near a bipartisan deal on immigration.

Earlier in the day, Jeff Flake, an open borders Republican, said they reached a deal. Any deal Flake likes can’t be good.

11 COMMENTS

  1. “Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?” Thank you President Trump, tell it like it is, America is not the worlds welfare program, the dems want us to be a third world shithole, all about votes and power, they don’t care about americans that are struggling, take your Daca, visas, refugees, chain migration, anchor babies, and shove you know where!!!!!!

  2. Also, who gives a rat’s ass? Not me, let Trump say what he wants. It’s worked for him so far. BTW, Who leaked this?

    • Let’s see. The people in the meeting were Goodlatte, Cotton, Graham and Durbin. My first choice is Durbin but Gramnesty is a close runner up.

    • I get a kick out of the liberals so shocked and appalled at the cursing. They’re favorite words are all four letter ones.

  3. TRUMP IS A CLASSIC NEW YORKER JUST LIKE ME, AND IN THE COURSE OF HIS CONVERSATIONS HE DOESN’T ATTEMPT THE CLOTH HIS WORDS WITH CHOCOLATES AND SWEET SMELLING FLOWERS. HE RATHER SPEAKS STRAIGHT AND FORWARD, LEAVING NO DOUBT ABOUT WHERE HIS MIND IS CENTERED AND HIS THOUGHTS BEING CONSIDERED. PERSONALLY SPEAKING THAT IS THE CORRECT CONCEPT TO GETTING YOUR MESSAGE ACROSS TO OTHERS. MOST PEOPLE CAN SPEAK FOR HOURS, AND YOU NEVER REALLY COMPREHEND THE DIRECTION IN WHICH THEY ARE GOING, NOT SO REGARDING TRUMP. NEEDLESS TO SAY, WITH TRUMP THERE IS NO GUESS WORK, BECAUSE YOU KNOW PRECISELY IN WHAT DIRECTION HE IS GOING. MOST POLITICAL PEOPLE SPEAK IN VAGUE CIRCLES, AND RARELY, IF EVER NAIL THE SUBJECT MATTER DOWN. NEEDLESS TO SAY, AS AN EX- NEW YORKER, I PREFER STRAIGHT TALK, EVEN IF IT HURTS THE FEELING OF THE MAJORITY OF THE “SNOWFLAKE” GENERATION, OR THE OLD GRAY HAIRED INDIVIDUALS OF YESTERDAY I COULDN’T CARE ANY LESS THAN I CURRENTLY DO,…PERIOD!!!!

  4. As of yet- I haven’t heard a reliable source say that Trump actually said this word(s).
    Ooooh dear. Someone over the age of 4, said a naughty word. Oh dear. What nonsense.

    As one author of this site said- (paraphrasing): [the use of this word- is it racist…No,…was it rude or not-the-cleverest-use-of-words, maybe].

    Me, TR, personally: I’d rather that the Government, and reporters, focus on bigger things, like, preventing unfairness in Congress + other parts of the Govt., helping people: get basic needs, help people get: housing, food, electricity, education, and things like that.

  5. Realize what the media has done. First, evidently the Washington Post says “there is no evidence that the word was Not used”?

    Remember what was the headline on Drudge yesterday about Twitter’s description of users they dislike. And NOW we have THIS word used against Trump, claimed by the none other than Lyin Durbin. Coincidence? I think not.

Comments are closed.