A widely cited doomsday study on economic damage from climate change published in Nature was retracted Wednesday following criticism from peers.
The research, published last year, projected that the world’s economic output would decline 62% by 2100 under a high-carbon emissions scenario.
The estimate was much more severe than other forecasts, prompting scrutiny of the underlying data.
The study examined historical data from some 1,600 regions worldwide over the past four decades to project how changes in temperature and precipitation would affect economic growth, including factors like agricultural yields, labor productivity and infrastructure.
However, after the study was published, other researchers found that economic data from one country—Uzbekistan—during a short time from 1995 to 1999 had skewed the results. Without Uzbekistan, the 2100 damage forecast fell to 23%, not 62%. The researchers published their critique in Nature in August.
Another researcher who wasn’t involved in the original work, Christof Schötz, said the results were more uncertain than the study suggested and published a separate critique in Nature in August.
The study had been cited by the U.S. Congressional Budget Office, the World Bank and the Network for Greening the Financial System, or NGFS, a coalition of central banks from which the Federal Reserve withdrew this year, reports the Wall Street Journal.
The error-ridden Potsdam study has frustrated some researchers, who say it damages climate scientists’ credibility. Economist Lint Barrage, who believes the study has even more “methodological problems” that “bias the results upward” than the retraction note admits, told the Times that “it can feel sometimes, depending on the audience, that there’s an expectation of finding large estimates.”
Free Beacon quotes Lint Barrage, “If your goal is to try to make the case for climate change,” Barrage said, “you have crossed the line from scientist to activist, and why would the public trust you?”
The retraction comes as activists have toned down their apocalyptic rhetoric on climate change.
Billionaire Bill Gates, who spent $2 billion trying to prevent what he called a “climate disaster,” said in October that climate change “will not be the end of civilization.” He added tht ineffective climate protests are “diverting money and attention from efforts that will have more impact on the human condition.”
Axios last week reported that climate change is “fading in importance on some U.S. lawmakers’ priority lists,” according to Free Beacon.
Remember the population bomb? That was for white people. Remember global warming, when we had to turn to plastic, now we must turn away from plastic. Then there was the oil shortage but everybody in China has a car now and don’t that bother the environmentalist.
But a white guy with a V-8 truck and they won’t stop complaining about it.
These guys have never ending ideas when it comes to destroying white people and their successful culture.
And our tax dollars probably paid for this blivet of bull.
If they were honest, the climate alarmists would admit that they are not working feverishly to hold down global temperatures — they would acknowledge that they are instead consumed with the goal of holding down capitalism and establishing a global welfare state.
Have doubts? Then listen to the words of former United Nations climate official Ottmar Edenhofer:
“One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole,” said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.
So what is the goal of environmental policy?
“We redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy,” said Edenhofer. For those who want to believe that maybe Edenhofer just misspoke and doesn’t really mean that, consider that a little more than five years ago he also said that “the next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world’s resources will be negotiated.”
Climate communism right from the horse’s mouth.
They are called climengelicals. They believe without question, man made climate change will doom the planet. By lessening our use of Carbon fuel, the planet will continue to support us. Climengelicals will not tolerate the heresy that man made climate change is not true.
If an evangelical encounters someone that does not believe in God, Jesus or the Bible, they nod their head and promise to pray for them. If you tell a climengelical man made climate change is cow plop, they’ll fight you.
There has been a bit of a reformation in the Church of Climate. There is a move on to “darken” the sky, to limit sunlight from heating the planet. I think it’s stupid. But, my real concern, who will control the thermostat?
Comments are closed.