Democrats Plot to Ignore SCOTUS Rulings They Don’t Like

8
2667

A Republic, if you can keep it.

~ Ben Franklin

Former think tank VP for Research and current NY Times contributor Will Wilkinson is pushing a new favorite idea of the Left. If you don’t like the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, just ignore it.

Democrats have been doing that or circumventing it for some time, but they’re stepping it up.

Any time Democrats don’t get what they want, it’s an “erosion of Democratic norms” and justifies ignoring the rule of law and norms while completely changing the system.

This is what he wrote in a series of three tweets:

If SCOTUS rules on regulation without a hearing or argument, the administration should simply ignore it and state that, in the absence of a normal process judicial review, it sees the court’s judgments as advisory but not binding.

The court famously has no enforcement authority. It’s authority is based in acceptance of the court’s legitimacy. But it can’t do whatever the hell it wants however it wants and expect deference. executive ought to brush off the court’s junta-like attempts to rule by edict.

When the court behaves in a transparently political way, it deserves political pushback.

Who decides if they’re political – him?

A Professor at Georgia State named Eric Segall commented, saying he made the same case last week.

In the article he linked to the tweet, he writes:

 There is one possible reform which, though rarely discussed, might work and which also has a solid foundation in American history. Perhaps it is time for the people and our elected leaders to threaten to ignore the Court when it intrudes into governmental policy where it simply does not belong. Although this suggestion sounds radical, it has a strong democratic pedigree and might be the only tool available to the American people to weaken our dysfunctional highest Court.

Segall is talking about ignoring the rule of law in favor of some random discussions on the issue over the course of our nation’s history.

The Left bypasses Congress and now they’ll bypass the Supreme Court of the United States.

PEN AND PHONE

This is the pen and phone approach of the Obama administration which is currently reconstituted in the Biden administration.

The Center for American Progress is funded by George Soros and co-founded by John Podesta. The Center laid out the 2010 blueprint for the use of executive orders, rulemaking, agency management, et al, to circumvent Congress in the organization’s definitive report, The Power of the President, Recommendations to Advance Progressive Change.

To quote Mr. Podesta, “The ability of President Obama to accomplish important change through these powers should not be underestimated.”

Everything they called for is happening now. The plan calls for the President to use rules, executive orders, agency management, and more to circumvent the other branches of government and states’ rights.


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

At that point, states will ignore the Executive orders and finally the scum will be purged when the shooting starts and the cities will be starved! Flyover will have their revenge!

Robert
Robert
3 years ago

The marxist/dems should ignore the SCOTUS from an uncomfortable prison cell in the worst prison we can find. Maybe the Mexicans will board them for a slight fee!

DemNutz
DemNutz
3 years ago

What’s good for the goose, is good for the gander. Bring it.

James Linsley
James Linsley
3 years ago

The Dumbacrats are doing it now on enforcing the laws at the border! Start perp walking these arrogant bastards starting with China Joe!!!!!

Sez1
Sez1
3 years ago

Remember when liberals doxxed politicians or folks they didn’t agree with and protested at their place of residence?

Curious, why aren’t the “conservatives” doing the same? Is it perhaps, they’re one in the same?