Gates’ Secret De-Population Meeting 13 Years Ago Exposed – Google’s on to the Cover-Up


Someone dug up a 13-year-old article about the world’s richest men, including our usual suspect Bill Gates secretly assembling to discuss “measures to curb overpopulation,” and Google is already in damage control mode.

It comes from The Sunday Times, London. Read it first, then look at how Google fact-checkers are moving in to “update” the news away.


May 24, 2009

Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation

America’s richest people meet to discuss ways of tackling a ‘disastrous’ environmental, social, and industrial threat

Climate change ‘biggest threat to human health’

Bill Gates funds unorthodox research

by John Harlow, Los Angeles

SOME of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population and speed up improvements in health and education.

The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.

Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America’s wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.

These members, along with Gates, have given away more than £45 billion since 1996 to causes ranging from health programmes in developing countries to ghetto schools nearer to home.

They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires’ aides were told they were at “security briefings”.

Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, said the summit was unprecedented. “We only learnt about it afterwards, by accident. Normally these people are happy to talk good causes, but this is different – maybe because they don’t want to be seen as a global cabal,” he said.

Some details were emerging this weekend, however. The billionaires were each given 15 minutes to present their favourite cause. Over dinner they discussed how they might settle on an “umbrella cause” that could harness their interests.

The issues debated included reforming the supervision of overseas aid spending to setting up rural schools and water systems in developing countries. Taking their cue from Gates
they agreed that overpopulation was a priority.

This could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values.

Gates, 53, who is giving away most of his fortune, argued that healthier families, freed from malaria and extreme poverty, would change their habits and have fewer children within half a generation.

At a conference in Long Beach, California, last February, he had made similar points. “Official projections say the world’s population will peak at 9.3 billion [up from 6.6 billion today], but with charitable initiatives, such as better reproductive healthcare, we think we can cap that at 8.3 billion,” Gates said then.

Patricia Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which gives more than £2 billion a year to good causes, attended the Rockefeller summit. She said the billionaires met to “discuss how to increase giving,” and they intended to “continue the dialogue” over the next few months.

Another guest said there was “nothing as crude as a vote,” but a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.

“This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest. “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”

Why all the secrecy? “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government,” he said.


Gates and his World Economic Forum allies don’t want you to call them de-populationists or de-growthers, but clearly, this is what they are.

As you can see, Google has its first warning label up.

Bill Gates, a wealthy, arrogant know-it-all, has set himself up as the public health decider for the world. He uses his money as a wedge. He’s not a doctor and he wants to de-populate the world, as well as bring us back to net-zero, the pre-industrial era.


It’s making him richer and more powerful. This is Jeffrey Epstein’s buddy, by the way. He used to drag his wife to wife-swapping events.

3 2 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 months ago

I was working Africa just before the 2010 World Cup and this story was flowing around everywhere. Africans saw it as the Rich White Man wanting to kill off Black People.

Here’s what I don’t understand. Rich prosperous countries tend to have lower birth rates. In the modern world, prosperity is all about cheap and plentiful energy. So why is US Government Energy policy about making energy scarce and expensive?

In a way we already know how to do Nuclear Fusion. We create Plutonium from Uranium in Breeder Reactors. Using Breeder Reactors we could create nuclear fuel in theory forever. Why are we not using all the energy assets available and building 100 Breeder Reactors a year while modernizing and decentralizing the Power Grid? With a much more robust power grid and dirt cheap electricity, the Government wouldn’t have to force EVs down everyone’s throat. Like it was said in Field Of Dreams, “If You Build It They Will Come”.
The problem is the way Liberals think. They always want control instead of just having better ideas and converting people.

5 months ago
Reply to  GuvGeek

Energy is inextricably linked to prosperity. Wealthy elites who have essentially partnered with governments globally (but especially the US) to influence (i.e. purchase) outcomes see prosperity as a commodity that has more value the rarer it is. So it is perfectly in keeping with the wealthy elite mindset to attack the issues most dear to them from a supply side mentality.

Truth Betold
Truth Betold
5 months ago
Reply to  GuvGeek

“The master planners devised the strategy of a merger – a Great Merger – among nations. But before such a merger can be consummated, and the United States becomes just another province in a New World Order, there must at least be the semblance of parity among the senior partners in the deal. How does one make the nations of the world more nearly equal? The Insiders determined that a two-prong approach was needed; use American money and know-how to build up your competitors, while at the same time use every devious strategy you can devise to weaken and impoverish this country. The goal is not to bankrupt the United States. Rather, it is to reduce our productive might, and therefore our standard of living, to the meager subsistence level of the socialized nations of the world. The plan is not to bring the standard of living in less developed countries up to our level, but to bring ours down to meet theirs coming up… It is your standard of living which must be sacrificed on the altar of the New World Order.” – Gary Allen ,”The Rockefeller File”, 1976

Mr. Myxpyx
Mr. Myxpyx
5 months ago

“On to the coverup” is very different from “In on the coverup”. Know the difference.

5 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Myxpyx

Clearly you know nothing about Google, and nothing about “the difference.” Clown.

5 months ago
Reply to  Jimmy

Did you have to call him a Clown. Was that really necessary for you to make your point.