Erick Erickson made an interesting point today in his newsletter. He believes the investigation of Mark Kelly is an unforced error which will pay off for Democrats in the end. What do readers think?
Erickson writes, “Let’s submit that there may be an actionable issue over what Senator Mark Kelly did. Just for the sake of argument, let’s say targeting him is lawful and not lawfare.
“Even so, not everything and everyone should be prosecuted.
“Targeting Mark Kelly raises his prominence on the Democratic Party side. It allows him to become a fundraising juggernaut. It allows Kelly to help promote Democratic candidates and elevate their stature. Kelly, of course, is concerned about the far left drift of the Democratic Party. Elevating him in this way aids the Democrats and Kelly.
“It also makes Kelly more prominent in the run-up to 2028. At a time Gavin Newsom was really, bizarrely, starting to get traction with Democrats because of his fighting with Trump, suddenly Kelly’s star rises, and he, a former member of the military from the swing state of Arizona who is more moderate than Newsom, gets attention, press, fundraising, and positive coverage from Democrats.
“This was an unforced error…”
Do we have bigger fish to fry and should we limit our probes?
Well I would like to see the republican party fry SOMETHING,…ANYTHING. So far NOTHING has been done about ANYTHING. They can’t even charge somebody with mortgage fraud with all the evidence is simple and in black and white. Very disappointed.
Want to understand what’s going on? Read FM 3-05.301 / MISO.
CIA Officers Tell Jesse Watters the Seditious Six Are Being Run as Assets in Destabilization Op
Like everything else, if law and order exists?, he will be held accountable for his actions. I’m hoping to see that it’s by military court marshal.
https://rumble.com/v727fv4-cia-officers-tell-jesse-watters-the-seditious-six-are-being-run-as-assets-i.html?mref=1t8q76&mc=5gu6n
That is 100% believable. Now others are coming out doing the same thing.
Reporting on Erickson is beneath the quality of this site. He was the first public never Trumper, early in 2016. Kelly’s action was a huge unforced error. He could have questioned the validity of US action instead. Instead he made a reckless comment. Why should we care about Newsom versus Kelly? How does fighting against the left become an error,… Read more »
It’s good to discuss other opinions. I didn’t say I agree.