Venezuela’s authoritarian President Nicolás Maduro issued a rare plea to Donald Trump in English, calling for peace with the United States as tensions between Caracas and Washington escalate following a series of U.S. military operations in the Caribbean and Pacific.
CBS News reports that Lindsey Graham [radical warmonger] says land strikes in Venezuela are a “real possibility.” Currently the US is carrying out air strikes against Venezuela and Colombian vessels that are reportedly carrying drugs and cartel members. Land strikes would be a very significant escalation.
He referred to Bush ’41’s actions in Panama and actions by Reagan to justify an attack.
It’s very alarming to hear that Lindsey Graham is involvee because his influence can only be a negative for a peace-loving president. He insists the orders to the military is these bombings are lawful. Are we sure about that?
Senator Graham has done a lot of damage, especially when one looks at his influence in Ukraine. Graham said Sunday on Face the Nation that there will be a congressional briefing on land strikes, not in invasion, although he also called for the removal of Venezuela’s leader, Dictator Nicholas Maduro. We have been told repeatedly we’re out of the business of regime change, but with Lindsey Graham on the scene, who knows.
Graham shouldn’t be anywhere near power.
Secretary Marco Rubio also has a serious issue with Maduro.
We have serious military hardware in the Caribbean.
U.S. land strikes on Venezuela are “a real possibility,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) says, telling @margbrennan President Trump plans to brief Congress about potentially expanding the U.S. military operations “from the sea to the land.”
“I support that idea. But I think he has… pic.twitter.com/q7iBG7D0H7
— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) October 26, 2025
Full video up through today only:
Graham is not involved. He is a recognized two faced buffoon. If we hit only cartel on land, because Maduro is not stopping the cartel, I think that is justified. There will not be a war.
“Land strikes would be a very significant escalation.” The statement caused me pause. Sure, strikes on the open seas against unflagged vessels is very politically different that strikes on sovereign territory. But what is the moral difference between destroying drugs on the ground and at sea?
It is an incursion into another country, not international waters. I’m no expert, but I think it involves the possibility of innocents being killed.