NY Times has a Bolton expose in time to resuscitate impeachment


Impeachment is not going well for Democrats, so, miraculously, just in time, the NY Times has a new crisis that will support the Democrats. It’s amazing how this works. Every crisis or scandal the media comes up with, and often manufactures, hurts Republicans and/or the President, never Democrats.


The NY Times reported earlier this evening that John Bolton notes in the new book he’s writing, that the President tied Ukraine aid to an investigation of the Bidens and the Democrats (for allegedly using Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 election).

The Democrats definitely interfered and attempted to get Ukraine to interfere from Alexandra Chalupa to the Manafort Black Book. Those are facts.

The Times claims Bolton sent drafts of a manuscript of his book in recent weeks to close associates and a draft to the White House for a standard review process.

Allegedly, Bolton “described not only the president’s private disparagement of Ukraine but also new details about senior cabinet officials who have publicly tried to sidestep involvement.”


He said, according to the unreliable Times, that Pompeo acknowledged privately that Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Guiliani claimed then-Ambassador Yovanovitch was corrupt. Pompeo allegedly said it had no basis in fact and Giuliani might have been working on behalf of other clients.

Bolton also is said to have raised concerns to Attorney General Barr about Giuliani running a “shadow government.”

Mr. Barr has denied that he heard it from Bolton.

Mick Mulvaney is also made to look like a liar, according to the Times account.

None of this is illegal if true, but it would make a liar out of the President. It does sound like John Bolton’s complaints are mostly with Rudy Giuliani, but not entirely.


Since then, a top aide to former national security adviser John Bolton disputed part of the Sunday report in The New York Times.

The paper reported that Bolton had circulated “drafts of a manuscript he has circulated in recent weeks to close associates” and also “sent a draft to the White House for a standard review process for some current and former administration officials who write books.”

Sarah Tinsley, a senior adviser to Bolton, told Fox News that he had submitted a hard copy draft of his manuscript to the NSC [National Security Council] several weeks ago for “pre-publication review,” but had not shared it with anyone else.


Bolton did not deny the Times’ claim concerning the Ukraine aid holdup and the possible investigation of the Bidens. In fact, he suggested the NSC leaked parts of his book.

It is very possible that Bolton himself or his publisher are the ones who leaked to make a profit off the situation.

The NY Times included this paragraph: “Mr. Bolton would like to testify for several reasons, according to associates. He believes he has relevant information, and he has also expressed concern that if his account of the Ukraine affair emerges only after the trial, he will be accused of holding back to increase his book sales.”

It makes it look as if Bolton is the leaker.

His attorney, Charles Cooper, said: “It is clear, regrettably, from The New York Times article published today that the prepublication review process has been corrupted and that information has been disclosed by persons other than those properly involved in reviewing the manuscript.”

He is working hard to make us think the NSC leaked it but did they? The timing with the impeachment trial is interesting.

Bolton could legally leak it as long as the information didn’t violate national security.

Additionally, Bolton’s representatives made clear he was not denying the Times’ claim concerning the Ukraine aid holdup and the possible investigation of the Bidens, Fox News reports.

Bolton resigned or was fired last September. His team declined to “speculate” to Fox News as to how a description of his manuscript might have leaked to the Times.


This has now led to Democrats demanding Bolton testify. Bolton said he would if subpoenaed, but the President will probably assert executive privilege and it will end up in court. This could drag on endlessly.

There is a lot more to this story that we don’t know. Usually, we wait a day or two to flesh it out, but this whole story is troubling. There is never a let-up.

People should hold their fire on this one. The President has admitted he wanted the Bidens investigated. The President also appears to have gotten the idea from Rudy Giuliani that the DNC server was in Ukraine. That is a complicated story and not as outlandish as it might sound.

Running for office doesn’t grant Joe Biden some special immunity from investigation. The opposite should, in fact, be true. We don’t want corrupt presidents.

Bolton is a conservative and knows the stakes here. If Trump loses, we get a socialist or a communist as President and possibly lose Congress.

Dan Bongino brought some balance with his tweet:



    • Money talks…and a lot of it has been circulating in high “political” circles in the past forty plus years and the ENTIRE Main Sewer Stream Fake Media has been bought, “lock, stock and barrel”…Bolton appears to be “feathering his nest”…

  1. Sounds like another Comey type leak and we know how that went. Bolton wants to sell books if he has to sell any integrity he may have had to it. To hell with Mustache Bolton and the NYT they aren’t exactly credible any longer, if they ever really were. Bongino is right, “Nobody cares”. Just end this farce.People are fed up with having to hear and look at the Brother’s Ugly, One Brow Naddy and and Bug Eyes Schitt.

  2. I doubt Bolton is going to backstab the chief executive. He seems more honorable than that. The NYT is a deep state outlet. Bolton left honorably. Trump’s policies worked.

    Of course, withholding the aid was entirely legitimate.

  3. Bolton is a total jerk and always has been. His only claim to fame is that he is a warmonger and cannot stand peace in any way. Also, the dems most likely paid him a bundle just like Hillary’s campaign did for the Russian b.s. news.

  4. The bottom line is that the NSC cannot be trusted to keep their mouths shut. There are still leakers within the NSC and that should be a priority to remedy. Want to see the POTUS clean the ranks of the NSC of all holdovers from any previous administration.
    Of course, he could be holding off to see those who think they can get away with leaking. Then, at some point in the near future, kicking them out. Maybe charges filed for security breaches as well. That would be delicious to watch.
    Like the rest of the law-abiding, rational-thinking taxpayers of this great nation, I’m really tired of the leftists and all their lying drivel.
    Just sayin’.

  5. What a surprise the New York Times launching another “Fake News” article just as the Schiffless Impeachment is falling apart. It probably has the same validity and credibility as the impeachment scam. NYT’s continues to provide cover and distraction for their masters in the moron sphere of corruption in the DNC.

    Nothing new.

Leave a Reply