President’s fierce response to NY Times hit piece from anonymous source(s)


A piece from the NY Times accuses Russians of placing bounties on the heads of American soldiers. The White House denies knowing anything about it. Rep. Liz Cheney wants more information proving they didn’t know. Can they prove a negative/

The New York Times reported Friday that U.S. intelligence officials concluded earlier this year that a Russian military unit covertly tried to offer rewards to Taliban-linked militants for killing coalition forces in Afghanistan. That allegedly included U.S. troops.

The U.S. intelligence apparatus has known for months about the alleged efforts of the Russian military intelligence unit. That’s according to the Times. They cited anonymous officials briefed on the matter. The report also noted that intel officials briefed Trump during an interagency meeting in March. A number of responses were discussed. However, they claimed, the White House has not authorized any, according to the Times.

One must wonder if this is one of John Bolton’s delusions.

The White House and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence pushed back on the Times report in separate statements on Saturday. In a tweet shared Sunday, Trump also fiercely denied receiving an intelligence briefing on Russian bounties.

The President called the NY Times “fake news,” and it often is as we have reported here. He questioned whether the person even exists.


He has been tough on Russia and noted it, comparing himself to the weakness of Obama and Biden. He could have also mentioned Biden’s complete subservience to China. President Trump said, “It’s probably just another phony Times hit job, just like their failed Russia hoax.” The President would like to know “their source.”

He didn’t let up on Biden:

Trump’s supporters also didn’t let up and made note of Joe using the “n” word in derogatory fashion years ago:



  1. ANYTHING or ANYONE coming from ANY MEMBER of BERRY SOTORO’S ADMINISTRATION is UTTERLY UNTRUSTWORTHY, & either a LIAR or a CONN ARTIST, or a thief, or a sexual weirdo!!!

    BEWARE! BE AWARE! BIDEN is not to be trusted!!!

  2. Here we go again, another G.Damn Republican that’s blind as a bat and just as ignorant. I can only guess she STILL believes Trump is some kind of Russian asset. What is it with these politicians. They either run to the door, or keep their mouths shut, but when they DO open their mouths it’s a subtle rebuke to POTUS or full on attack. And You people Want My Damn Vote. They better start realizing that fewer and fewer people are voting for the (R) out of some misplaced loyalty. People learned a great deal about Republicans with the Obamacare “repeal and replace” nonsense. Many of us found out the Republicans can be big liars the same as Democrats. We saw what was SO important to them during the Impeachment process, passing a bill to restrict any action against Iran. But,,,but,,,but, “it’s principles”. So, if Republicans have NO loyalty why should I.

  3. What do you want to bet that it came from a certain “General”. I wouldn’t bother to read the article but since an excerpt was posted I see it references “March”. Why wasn’t that article written back in March, or even April. Did Cheney or Crenshaw bother to read the article, and if so, why wouldn’t THEY have pointed this out. People need to realize there are Many More leftists in the military than one would assume. Just look how many recent candidates have been veterans.

  4. More New York Times fake news and here it is:

    Members of the American intelligence community have concluded that members of the Russian intelligence unit offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants if they successfully killed members of the American military, the New York Times reported. The problem, however, is that almost everyone involved in this story says it isn’t true. The White House, Russia and even the Taliban have said the Times’ story is false. .

  5. This is an obvious disinformation leak by the defense/intelligence people in support of the coup. They want Russia to be the fake enemy to overshadow the real enemy China.

Leave a Reply