The Supreme Court on Monday vacated a ruling which found that former President Trump violated the First Amendment by blocking his critics on Twitter, with the justices basically dismissing the case as moot.
Seven people sued over then-President Trump blocking [their offensive, dishonest, non-stop] posts.
Lower courts found that the President violated their free speech rights.
In the 12-page opinion, the cases were dealt with separately but the conclusions suggested they did not hold merit.
Since then, all leftist social media platforms banned Donald Trump after demands to do so by the Democrat Party, their medial and the social media cancel culture.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
So Liberals think it’s OK to Cancel People and they should be punished if they fight back. Liberals can say all the stupid things they want, but it doesn’t mean I have to listen to them.
Looks at URL, nope not the Mystery Babylon Bee.
What a fundamentally destroyed from within society.
Prattling on about first amendment rights after purging the POTUS and portions of his followers from the putrid propaganda hive.
Exiled from the LAME woke Red Guards purity über alles unibrain? You’re doing it right.
There are some interesting points made by Justice Thomas. One being regulating social media as a common carrier.
The government cannot accomplish through threats of adverse government action what the Constitution prohibits it from doing directly. See ibid.; Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U. S. 991, 1004–1005 (1982). Under this doctrine, plaintiffs might have colorable claims against a digital platform if it took adverse action against them in response to government threats.
Sen. Warner came out with his “White Paper” and threated social media if they Didn’t comply. Sandberg ADMITTED in one hearing they WERE following his White Paper.