We have a shadow government. Who do you think has been running it for the past four years? We know who the workers are. For instance, Jake Sullivan and Antony Blinken are destroying our foreign affairs.
Who is behind them? Obama, Soros, Clinton?
This is the problem with not removing Joe Biden with the 25th Amendment.
Mario Nawfal
While Democrats rage against Elon’s “unelected influence” for exposing wasteful spending, a recent bombshell report reveals an unprecedented usurpation of executive power: Biden’s presidency has been largely run by proxies, with cabinet members rarely gaining direct access to their commander-in-chief.
Even Treasury Secretary Yellen – traditionally one of the most important cabinet positions – was kept at arm’s length, forced to communicate through intermediaries.
Defense Secretary Austin’s regular briefings became increasingly rare, even as wars erupted in Ukraine and Gaza.
Cabinet members stopped requesting presidential access altogether, knowing such requests would be denied.
This wasn’t mere delegation – it was an institutional coverup.
Where Obama actively engaged with his cabinet to debate policy, Biden’s team created an impenetrable barrier of handlers who issued top-down directives with little presidential involvement.
Yet when Elon used X’s transparency to trim a 1,547-page spending bill to 118 pages, these same Democrats decried his “shadow” influence.
The hypocrisy is staggering – Washington would rather have unelected staffers secretly running the executive branch than face public scrutiny of its bloated spending.
The message is clear: the establishment will protect its own while fighting those who dare to lift the veil.
Who was (still is for another month) actually in charge of the White House? https://t.co/zgoUakDyc2
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 24, 2024
The shadow government, also referred to as cryptocracy, secret government, or invisible government, is a family of theories based on the notion that real and actual political power resides not only with publicly elected representatives but with private individuals who are exercising power behind the scenes
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Well, corporate media has reported Alex Soros visits the White House multiple times per week. Ergo, he must be buying/influencing/decrying something.
Good article. Those who are commenting about lack of detail are not up on all the manure behind the curtain, or as this Kat likes to say, the turds deeply buried.
“This is the problem with not removing Joe Biden with the 25th Amendment.” Such a statement without venturing as brief a comment as to whether anything policy wise would change under Harris, who would have been installed should your longing for the 25th amendment have been exercised. The accompanying summation perhaps should have been “Harris is the bigger problem with removing Joe Biden with the 25th Amendment.” Biden was untenable for reelection, period. Harris as President running against Trump would have been somewhat more tenable than she turned out, which was to come up short in the popular vote by only 1.5%. The 2024 popular vote results are still a frightening statistic about the state of America.
Even more so than Biden’s boisterous challenge to debate Trump the arguably biggest political blunder of the year was Trump’s agreeing to do so prior to the conventions or at least still closer to them. It is not like Trump did not have a history of avoiding debates (or party protocol). The Dems may have been saddled with dementia Joe Biden. The Dems’ were re-energized with the last minute changeover, or at least their apparat. They avoided total early demoralization, Trump’s blunder kept hope alive. Trump himself had little discernible coattails outside of red states. I think it could be argued Republicans would have done better leaving the 25th Amendment agitation alone and Trump not being Trump in his less than 4-D chess bravado agreeing to debate Biden early and against protocols. Still glad he won of course but we could have more easily done better.
So, the question was: would Harris have been more or less destructive than that of the (liar) Blinken/Jarrett/Rice/Obama cell? Probably they and Schumer/Pelosi/Jeffries knew using the Mr. 10% corpse would give them a better chance at the election than the Valley Girl.
“This is the problem with not removing Joe Biden with the 25th Amendment.” Such a statement without venturing as brief a comment as to whether anything policy wise would change under Harris, who would have been installed should your longing for the 25th amendment have been exercised. The accompanying summation perhaps should have been “Harris is the bigger problem with removing Joe Biden with the 25th Amendment.” Biden was untenable for reelection, period. Harris as President running against Trump would have been somewhat more tenable than she turned out, which was to come up short in the popular vote by only 1.5%. The 2024 popular vote results are still a frightening statistic about the state of America.
Even more so than Biden’s boisterous challenge to debate Trump the arguably biggest political blunder of the year was Trump’s agreeing to do so prior to the conventions or at least still closer to them. It is not like Trump did not have a history of avoiding debates (or party protocol). The Dems may have been saddled with dementia Joe Biden. The Dems’ were re-energized with the last minute changeover, or at least their apparat. They avoided total early demoralization, Trump’s blunder kept hope alive. Trump himself had little discernible coattails outside of red states. I think it could be argued Republicans would have done better leaving the 25th Amendment agitation alone and Trump not being Trump in his less than 4-D chess bravado agreeing to debate Biden early and against protocols. Still glad he won of course but we could have more easily done better.
Too late now, Biden will be gone in less than a month and it takes Congress longer than that to do anything.