The FBI and other law enforcement agencies are zeroing in on the suspected killer of Charlie Kirk.
They tracked the suspect to the building he used to take his shot. They have him jumping off the building and running to the neighborhood. They also have footwear prints and palm prints.
The sound bite of the killer’s movements:
They have the weapon. It is a bolt-action rifle, which is very accurate.
FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke said he blended in with the college crowd. They must have great images and he sounds young.
Just like the narcissistic young of today, he thinks himself a genius, but he’s actually an ignorant, blundering foo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhRZ8ZFN6Ds
Robinson is a set up patsy. It was Kirks own zionist security who murdered him.
It will be months before anything is clarified. It scares me that the FBI is leading the investigation. Patel hasn’t cleaned house yet .
Force is the final arbiter
Can we believe anything we’re told?
I’m SKEPTICAL: This was a professional hit by a skilled cold-blooded assassin. It’s possible the near-antique rifle, ammo, foot, hand and arm prints could be staged. There might even have been a patsy. Third time (for a suspect) might NOT be a charm.
(COMPARE THESE TWO !!!)
Did they release the brand and model of rifle? I know they said it was a bolt action. Modern bolt action rifles are still being produced. Our Walmart sells them.
It was an older Mauser .30-06, bolt action.
Apparently, it’s an old German K98 Mauser army rifle remade into a .30-06 calibre sporting rifle.
There are going to be a lot of people who will want to kill the trannys. this is going to get even uglier.
that’s a delusion no one wants to kill the mentally insane come on now
Kirk is now a martyr for the cause. His murder proves that Wokeness and Godless ideologies are bankrupt of reason and as Isaac Asimov once said, “Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent”. We will win the war against the Woke without violence, but with reason, logic, and a sound mind.
I like Asimov a lot, but his words aren’t scripture. God Himself sometimes decides, with logic, reason, and a sound mind, that it is time for war.
That is true about God. It’s a good thing it isn’t anyone of us
That isn’t sound theology. Don’t get stuck in the Old Testament, or what God did in the Old Testament. We have a New Testament. If Jesus wanted us to war, he would have given examples. He did yell at some religious people, and he did get mad at the moneychangers in the temple, but even then he only overturned the tables and didn’t directly assault any people. The Word of God is the sword. As far as revenge, the bible teaches us that the Lord will recompense.
Self defence is another thing entirely. Peace to you.
Matthew 10:34, Luke 22:36-38: consider this.
For your consideration:
Jesus was speaking to only the 12 apostles at the time. Many of the things He said to them were for them, and their particular mission. Think: John 14:13–14
That was an instruction for the Apostles. The doctrine is called “Audience relevance”, and tied into the greater discipline of hermeneutics (science of interpretation).
That said, I do not believe we as Christians are called to allow ourselves to be killed.
Exodus 22:2–3
Basically, this states that if someone breaks into your house in the night and you kill him, you have no blood on your hands, but don’t murder the intruder in the day. This is notwithstanding any other things that person might be doing during the day that would cause you to defend yourself and have to use lethal force.
Numbers 35:22–25
Shows the distinction between killing and murder.
.He physically drove them out of the temple with a whip.
Normally I would agree with you.
This however is more in line with:
There is a time for war and a time for peace.
This is not a time for peace.
“Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent”
except when it is done in self defense
Comments are closed.