THE TEXAS LAWSUIT
Yesterday, the State of Texas filed a lawsuit against Pennsylvania and three other states that have seriously damaged the electoral process in their states. Now, other states are concerned that those four states violating their own election law have diminished their votes. Eight states have joined the lawsuit.
The Texas lawsuit claiming the violations of election law in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin, disenfranchise Texas voters is the last shot. The Left claims it is a bizarre, preposterous lawsuit and has no chance of winning.
However, as a point of law, it is hardly bizarre.
Several other states — Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Missouri, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota — have all announced that they will be joining Texas in the suit along with President Trump. It might be hard to ignore.
Post it again. Here’s a screen shot: pic.twitter.com/gmOOVfDhme
— Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) December 9, 2020
Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt announced late on Monday that his state would back Texas’ lawsuit at the Supreme Court.
“Election integrity is central to our republic,” Schmitt wrote on Twitter. “And I will defend it at every turn. As I have in other cases — I will help lead the effort in support of Texas’ #SCOTUS filing today. Missouri is in the fight.”
Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge said that after reviewing Texas’ lawsuit: “I have determined that I will support the motion by the State of Texas in all legally appropriate manners.”
-
The Importance of Prayer: How a Christian Gold Company Stands Out by Defending Americans’ Retirement
Louisiana AG Jeff Landry stated:
“Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution. That is why the Justices should hear and decide the case which we have joined representing the citizens of Louisiana,” Landry said. “Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments. Louisiana citizens are damaged if elections in other states were conducted outside the confines of the Constitution while we obeyed the rules.”
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said in a statement that he expects the Supreme Court to “act quickly in deciding whether to grant the State of Texas’s request.”
“That decision will instruct me as to how the State of Alabama will proceed in our fight to ensure election integrity,” the statement continued. “The unconstitutional actions and fraudulent votes in other states not only affect the citizens of those states, they affect the citizens of all states — of the entire United States. Every unlawful vote counted, or lawful vote uncounted, debases and dilutes citizens’ free exercise of the franchise. The State of Alabama will continue to pursue any legal remedy available to protect her people from such disenfranchisement. Both our rights and our republic demand it.”
The Lawsuit
TEXAS EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE LAWSUIT IS GETTING BIGGER: #Missouri, #Kentucky, #Louisiana, #Mississippi, #SouthCarolina, #SouthDakota, #Texas, #Alabama, #Arkansas and #Florida have just signed on against #Georgia, #Michigan, #Pennsylvania and #Wisconsin!#EqualProtectionMatters pic.twitter.com/UtZ0UTbBx5
— John Cremeans 🇺🇸 (@JCremeans) December 9, 2020
Pennsylvania Told the SCOTUS They Have to Ignore or There Might Be Chaos [Riots]
The state of Pennsylvania published their response to the Supreme Court which has rejected the Kelly case injunction opposing move-in ballots. The Kelly case is based on the fact, and it is a fact, that Pennsylvania’s General Assembly violated their own state constitution to change election processes at the last minute.
The response by the state is very troubling, but the most disturbing aspect is claiming that if the case moves forward, there will be chaos (riots). Imagine if that is how the Justices decide the law?
We don’t know because SCOTUS issued an abrupt one-line response, unsigned and without explanation. They rejected the emergency injunction so far, not the case.
Pennsylvania files their response to the Supreme Court and basically they say that even if laws were broken, they shouldn’t interfere. pic.twitter.com/Dz0uMOEg1z
— Vernon (@ReduxVernon) December 8, 2020
The Pennsylvania team lied in their filing.
Not one single claim has been rejected by a state or federal court on the merit of evidence. they have ALL been procedural rejections, no evidence has been submitted past signed affidavits. This lie should really intrigue Alito. pic.twitter.com/4PBuQR1JQb
— Vernon (@ReduxVernon) December 8, 2020
We broke the law, but retaliation would sow chaos and confusion. unreal. pic.twitter.com/LDymITxdGB
— Vernon (@ReduxVernon) December 8, 2020
wpDiscuz
