LifeSite News reports the Canadian Parliament is passing a new anti-free speech law to tack on to the last hate speech law. This one has the potential to criminalize private family conversations.
Bill C-16 creates a new offense under Criminal Code Section 264.1 for patterns of “coercive or controlling conduct” in relationships. However, it reportedly goes far beyond abuse and lists non-violent behaviors that are subject to after-the-fact interpretation.
“Do you think the government should criminalize everyday interactions in your home with your family? If not, you should read Bill C-16,” MP Leslyn Lewis wrote on X. “The bill creates new offenses (Criminal Code Section 264.01), which are deeply concerning for normal, loving family interactions, based on a ‘pattern of coercive or controlling conduct,’ even when no violence, threats, or illegal acts occur.”
“These are not crimes,” Lewis wrote. “They are part of marriage, parenting, and shared responsibility. This does not diminish the seriousness of coercive control in genuinely abusive relationships. But criminal law should target clear abuse and violence, which are already addressed in law. Bill C-16, as written, opens the door to police intervention in the homes of ordinary families.”
Lewis gave some examples:
- Asking a spouse where they are after they said they’d be home,
- Expressing concern about excessive drinking,
- Disagreeing about finances or spending,
- Asking a partner not to give children junk food,
- Raising concerns about time away from family,
- Setting household boundaries or expectations,
I wish President Trump hadn’t turned Canadians off to voting for the conservative presidential candidate.
If this man is correct, it’s a disaster for Canadians.
Conservatives think parking Bill C-9 is a win—they’re wrong.
This bill doesn’t just regulate speech; it criminalizes emotion. By defining “hate” as a legal “feeling,” C-9 creates the foundation for Bills C-16 and C-63 to dismantle free speech and religious freedom in Canada.… pic.twitter.com/nQMsdgGdm0
— Nico Lagan (@RealNicoLagan) January 27, 2026
Another euroTRASH country bits the dust, you people up there are INSANE!!!!!!!!!!
DROP CARNEY & DOUG FORD INTO A WOOD CHIPPER TODAY
CANADIAN MILITARY NEEDS TO USE C -4 AND BLOW UP QUEENS PARK AND OTTAWA WHEN IT IS IN SESSION
The product of the AWFUL* “mind.”
* “Affluent White Female Urban Liberal”
What you are all complaining about is democracy which is the worst political constitution there is. All the crimes, perversions, corruptions and gangsterism comes together under the banner of democracy in the service of money.
True democracy is MOB RULE!!!!!!!!!!
Most under 40 are on anxiety meds and are triggered just because you exist.
Give these mentally impaired people a “god ahead” to call the Fuzz whenever they feel ‘threatened’ is a civilization suicide.
You canocks have LOST your country to a collection of leftard IMBECILES!!!
wow just wow no wonder they disarmed them
The communist and gay mafioso has infiltrated mainstream government and are presently trying to cause as much chaos as possible in order to destroy the fabric of Western thought and society.
Going to be a lot of dead cops if they come to take you away for those reasons, bye bye !!!
If it passes for you guys it will be a nightmare. It would just take 1 family member that was offended at what you said,run to the police,rat the person out,then bingo
There is no way to prove a hate crime if you cannot read someone’s mind to determine their motives. Even the words of a person may be very misleading. If someone physically assaults or kills a person, one could surmise that hatred is behind the actions but even then it may be other factors like envy or jealousy.
A threat to kill may be uttered in anger because of being bullied or mercilessly taunted without the intent of committing the actual deed. That is why actual deeds like murder and assault can be proven and punished while words often cannot.
If words are slander or false witness, there are laws to punish the offender. However, words that call evil evil should never be proscribed and punished as a hate crime. Hate is a human emotion and may in certain circumstances not only be understandable but correct. Should one not hate deceit, bribery, unjust gain, falsehoods, pride and numerous evil actions?
If a law criminalizes private discussions and hate would corrupt judges allow the accused to challenge them to provide proof when they cannot or tie them up in legalese and a very costly defence to prevent justice? Morally bankrupt legislators and corrupt courts despise anyone who shows them up so would rather rule against innocent people.
Liberals in Canada try every few years to pass similar bills, they fail but they keep trying…and they will eventually succeed.
England, Ireland, Germany are arresting people for opinions on social media, this will soon happen in Canada.
Actually it has begun, last week a Canadian on facebook posted the letter he received telling him he has to go to court to explain what he posted on Facebook, which was a joke vaguely about eliminating politicians, which I suppose they consider inciting violence.
To be honest I did not read the details.
But even before those bills are turned into laws Canada has begun behaving like Big Brother…or worse.
It’s not just the Liberals. The Con-job-servatives have been behind the Auntie Shem-itism and Hollow-Co$t D-Nile legislation. This shite started, in earnest, with the 1982 coup d’état disguised as “The Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. We used to have politicians, irrespective of political party that were pragmatic. Now they are all dogmatic.
Comments are closed.