Chuck Schumer tweeted that he is introducing a bill to move the US Marshals to the Judiciary, stepping into the world of clown senators with that one.
According to him, he’s protecting Americans from President Trump and Attorney General Bondi. That’s after he corrupted the judiciary by his own account to keep Donald Trump from running the country.
“BREAKING: We’re introducing a bill to stop Trump and Bondi from weaponizing US Marshals,” Schumer tweeted.
“It’ll move the Marshals from the Executive to the Judiciary Branch.
“It’ll stop Trump and Bondi from interfering as they enforce court orders or weaponizing them to intimidate citizens and government employees.”
It’s Democrats who weaponized law enforcement when they used the Federal Air Marshals to follow Tulsi Gabbard around as if she were a spy.
The Responses Online Were Good
Chuck, you absolute genius! So, you’re telling me the best way to “protect” the U.S. Marshals is to rip them out of the Executive Branch—where they’ve been since George Washington signed the Judiciary Act in 1789—and toss them into the Judiciary, which, by the way, has zero…
— RabbitTurd (@TheJetEngineer) May 22, 2025
So, let me get this straight. If you lose an election where the American people voted for a candidate that shares their values, then you’ll just change laws and the constitution to defeat the will of the people?
Treasonous, Chuck. Try harder in the next election. It won’t work…
— Moral Tourism (@moraltourism) May 22, 2025
You’re whining never ends. Your legacy will be “the most annoying, whiny bitch in politics”. pic.twitter.com/PQr6IGTJoG
— HoneyBadger12 (@KMN34223) May 22, 2025
Brilliant, let’s make it so U.S. Marshals can’t arrest anyone.
Only a democrat would come up with a stupid anti-America idea like this.
— DK (@1Nicdar) May 22, 2025
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Funny thing is there is no “judicial authority” exercised by ANY government in America today. ALL courts are statutory administrative courts, which can not under any circumstances act under the judicial authority of any constitution. but hey, why would anybody want to waste time trying to learn the Law and figure that out?
The gall of this idiot…he should the last person on earth to talk about the ‘weaponization’ of the judiciary…he belongs to the ‘cabal’ that perfected the art.
Get this: Chucky Schumer doesn’t want the President of the United States and the US Attorney General to “interfere” with the Democrats’ subversive takeover of America’s judicial system. Precious.
It sounds like Chuck wants a Nazi Dicktatorship
There will be far from 60 votes.
This suggestion is like Brazil, where the judiciary has a police force, which arrested election protesters and opposition leaders.
In the Constitution, only the executive branch controls law enforcement.