Could Russia Attack the Arc Integrity, Now Taking 60 Bradley Tanks to Ukraine?

36
1731

Bradley tanks to Ukraine

Sixty fighting Bradley tanks were put on a US ship, the Arc Integrity, for eventual transport to Ukraine. Professor Sal asks if this is a legitimate target for Russians.

This is similar to how we got into World War I. Germany attacked US Merchant Vessels.

This is the 106th anniversary of Germany declaring warfare against the Allies a second time. That is when Germany sank Merchant ships and killed over 60 sailors.

The question is can Russia attack the Arc Integrity, the ship carrying the Bradley tanks? Look to the 106th anniversary and the beginning of World War I. (Go to about 13:00). Sal doesn’t think so. Any attack on US shipping would be a direct attack on the US. He does not know what Putin would do, but it would be an act of war. That’s why he believes it’s important for US ships to transport the equipment.

Watch:


PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DICK SIMMONS
Guest
DICK SIMMONS
1 year ago

The ship will deliver its cargo. Period. As one poster has figured, to Bremen or my guess is to Gdansk. Putin’s best weapon and one he is using daily, is shouting “BOO!” and watching the West scurry for the fallout shelters.

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
1 year ago
Reply to  DICK SIMMONS

I don’t think Putin is playing games. He’s letting Winter take it’s toll on Ukraine by destroying power plants as fast they can be repaired. I expect a Russian Blitzkrieg in 6 or 8 weeks and this will be over. Then the Kremlin will start a Propaganda War against the West with all the captured intel. That will be the Real War, because that will be when Putin goes after the US Dollar as the Reserve Currency. Putin is playing the same game on us that Reagan played on the USSR. An economic crisis will cause the US to implode from within.

Doyle
Guest
Doyle
1 year ago

Wondered into this Russian troll/ Eurotrash site…much to my chagrin.

Greg
Guest
Greg
1 year ago
Reply to  Doyle

A shill for MSM which will believe anything fed to him.

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
1 year ago
Reply to  Doyle

Doyle: What you wondered into was a website that allows free speech. Your ideas where just rejected, but you weren’t cancelled so feel free to come back again. I would suggest that you do some real research first as the people on this site tend to be very well informed.

Papa
Guest
Papa
1 year ago

Has anyone seen any articles that verify Russia purchased hypersonic missles from China that travel up Mach 10 and don’t need to fly in straight line?

Doyle
Guest
Doyle
1 year ago
Reply to  Papa

It’s called crashing when they don’t fly in a straight line. Flying in an arc is hardly novel either and if you believe they work as advertised then I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.

John Vieira
Guest
John Vieira
1 year ago

Russia should just track them to source and annihilate them on delivery….

Doyle
Guest
Doyle
1 year ago
Reply to  John Vieira

They do not have the capability otherwise they’d have been interdicting arms shipments before now.

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
1 year ago

When a Merchant Ship transports military cargo to a war zone, it is no longer a Merchant Ship. At best it is a Mercenary Vessel if it has a Civilian Crew and so a legitimate target as it is now part of a Military Supply Chain. If the Ship is flying a US Flag then it’s the US that is creating an Act of War. The Arc Integrity probably should Fly the Jolly Roger. I wouldn’t want to be it’s insurance company!

I was told by old time mariners that In the early part of WWII, a submarine would surface and give a merchant ship 5 minutes to abandon ship before sending it to Davy Jones’ Locker. When the military escorts a ship there is no such courtesy. I suspect there will be some type of escort. In my days as a Merchant Seaman, I transported military cargo; I’d take a pass on this job!

Obviously. Joe Biden doesn’t have the balls to use a Military Transport with a Military crew for this mission. What a Wanker!

Doyle
Guest
Doyle
1 year ago
Reply to  GuvGeek

Who says they’re going into a war zone. You do realize there are NATO ports on the Black Sea assuming they are going there and not another NATO port in the Med. Your macho nonsense and cowardice aside you’re just posturing, such a bad person, color me impressed…..

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
1 year ago
Reply to  Doyle

The ultimate destination of the cargo is a War Zone. The US has interdicted ships with Military Cargoes heading to war zones for many decades. I’ve spent many years working with the Navy in both Gulf Wars after serving in the Navy. I know the US Navy well and the Russians know the US Navy even better. Today’s US Navy is risk intolerant which is why they are using a Merchant Ship.

The Black Sea would be out of the question, too many Russian assets there. The most probable port would be Hamburg or Bremerhaven. There might be a possibility of Gdansk over in Poland, but I would think that would be long shot. Russia has too much of a Baltic Sea presence.
The real problem is that tensions are high and a miscalculation can spin this out of control. The Traitor Joe Administration is not playing with dynamite, they are playing with the potential for Nuclear Weapons use with a Country who has a first use doctrine because of their limited man power compared to the US and Europe!

Your comments show a lack of knowledge or just plain foolishness. I hope you’re not a White House adviser.

Pa l
Guest
Pa l
1 year ago
Reply to  Doyle

Duh…”I’m sending tanks to Ukraine, but these aren’t the tanks you’re looking for”….ya, that will really work. Color you stoopid.