Jenna Ellis pleaded guilty today to one felony count in the Georgia election fraud case. The count stems from Ellis’s testimony before a Georgia Senate subcommittee on December 3, 2020, alongside Rudy Giuliani and Ray Smith.
She disavowed Donald Trump as she pleaded guilty in the Fulton election probe. She was his attorney and one of the biggest proponents of this election case.
Janet Ellis isn’t rich and would never have been able to pay for the trial. She’s now agreed to testify against Donald Trump and her other co-defendants.
Ellis did not plead guilty to RICO charges. She pled guilty to something she drafted for the plea deal. She also says that the stolen election claims about Georgia were false statements.
The DA is trying to simplify the case and get to Donald Trump. Fani Willis wants to use the defendants against Donald Trump. That’s the big fish Willis wants. He will have his own lawyers testify against him in this case. Janet Ellis was definitely one of his lawyers, unlike Sidney Powell.
In exchange for pleading to one felony count of aiding in abetting, she must cooperate with the court.
GO DEEPER
In the testimony, and late 2020, she claims she “knowingly, willingly, and unlawfully” made full statements about election fraud in Georgia.
Under the terms of the agreement, she must serve five years probation, 100 hours of community service, and pay $ 5,000 in restitution to the Georgia Secretary of State’s office. She also agreed to testify truthfully, provide documents and other evidence, refrain from posting about the case on social media, and apologize to Georgia voters.
She is the fourth defendant to strike a plea deal. Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesbrough struck similar deals along with an election worker.
One of the allegedly full statements she made was that at least 96,000 fraudulent absentee ballots were cast in the election. She claimed 2506 felons voted, 66,248 underage voters cast ballots, and 10,315 dead people voted. None of these things turned out to be provably true.
In tears, she told Judge Scott McAfee that if she had known what she knows now, she would’ve declined to represent Donald Trump in post-election challenges. She said she has “deep remorse.” She claimed that she relied on senior attorneys to give her true and reliable information, and she was working at a frenetic pace and did not do the “due diligence” required.
Ellis is the fourth of 19 defendants to plead guilty in this case. Her agreement comes less than a week after two others, Sidney Powell and Ken Chesebro, negotiated deals just hours before going to trial.
— Tamar Hallerman (@TamarHallerman) October 24, 2023
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
When a judge refuses to look at the evidence, one cannot say anything was proven false or proven true.
here is two other examples of how corrupt judges refused to look at evidenceof voting fraud.
from the same article at the Federalist I mentioned above,
Too Early and Too Late
Republicans also often found themselves in an impossible “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation on the timing of challenges to election laws.
In Georgia Republican Party, Inc. et al. v. Raffensperger et al, candidates Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue sued prior to their U.S. Senate run-offs, alleging harm would occur from unconstitutional election procedures. Their counsel noted (on appeal) that the court “dismissed the case for lack of standing, reasoning that ‘the Supreme Court instructs that a theory of future injury is too speculative to satisfy the well-established requirement that threatened injury must be certainly impending.’” Filed too early.
In the same state, a federal judge dismissed Sidney Powell’s lawsuit (Pearson v. Kemp), in part citing that it was filed too late—it should have been filed before the election. As another example, in Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, a judge dismissed the president’s suit saying it involved “issues he plainly could have raised before the vote occurred.”
Together, it demonstrated the hurdle that many election cases faced—denied before the election as “speculative,” or afterward as too late.
Not liking evidence does not change the fact it is evidence.
Not provably true… are you sure?
Because as far as I know, almost nothing was ever verified or verified the correct and honest way.
An excerpt from this ” old” long-ish article that provides specific cases and links, explains how almost none of the fraud was ever investigated,
and if something is not investigated, not verified, how can anyone say it is true or not true ?
Please everyone DO READ THE FOLLOWING !
link,
https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/11/courts-repeatedly-refused-to-consider-trumps-election-claims-on-the-merits/
Death by TechnicalitiesFirst of all, we can recognize that many of the cases produced no useful information relative to election integrity. We learned nothing from a lawsuit dismissed by a state judge in Georgia (Boland v. Raffensperger) on the basis that the plaintiff had sued an “improper party” rather than hearing the merits of why the ballot rejection rate allegedly dropped from 1.53 percent in 2018 to 0.15 percent in the 2020 general election.
Also, did 20,000 people vote who do not live in the state, when Georgia’s electoral votes were allotted by an approximately 12,000 margin to Biden? We never learned the answers to those questions nor even examined the evidence, because Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger was not a candidate for office nor the election superintendent who conducted the election, and therefore per state law, was not liable.
Similarly, a Trump lawsuit in Michigan (Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Benson) alleging state law was violated by the failure to allow access by observers, and seeking to stop counting, was ruled moot since it was not filed until 4:00 p.m. on Nov. 4, after votes were counted. The judge simultaneously relieved the secretary of state of responsibility for any wrongdoing because she had issued guidance requiring admission of credentialed challengers.
So we are left with the memory of the videos of vote counters clapping as Republican observers were evicted and of covers being placed over windows. The judge on this case also said Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson bore no legal responsibility for video monitoring of drop boxes nor of making video from such surveillance available, despite a recently passed law requiring surveillance of all drop boxes installed after Oct. 1.
A lawsuit in Pennsylvania, Metcalfe v. Wolf, claimed “approximately 144,000 to 288,000 completed mail-in and/or absentee ballots” in Pennsylvania may have been illegal based on testimony from a U.S. Postal Service contractor. The contractor said he was hired to haul a truck of what he believed to be this many completed mail-in ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. The complaint also alleged there was “evidence” of ballots that were backdated at a postal facility in Erie.
The judge tossed it since the state’s Election Code required their request to be filed within 20 days of the alleged violation, which was Nov. 23. They filed Dec. 4. We’ll never know if that truck brought in pallets of completed ballots—an amount sufficient to overturn the state’s Electoral College vote.
In Wisconsin, the Trump v. Evers suit alleged that violations of state election law had occurred in Milwaukee and Dane Counties as municipal clerks issued absentee ballots without the required written application, that they illegally completed missing info on ballots, that absentee ballots were wrongly cast by voters claiming “Indefinite Confinement” status (and for which no ID was provided), and that Madison’s “Democracy in the Park” event violated election laws.
A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court refused to hear the lawsuit, sidestepping a decision on the merits of the claims and instead ruling the case must first wind its way through lower courts—an effective death sentence given the timing.
you don t like evidence of voting fraud, but it is still evidence of voting fraud.
Where the hell is the Supreme Court to put an end to all this nonsense? The country is nothing but a joke now.
It is not a crime to make claims in a hearing, as opinion.
Do not try to tell us that none of it was provably true! It did not go to court. No judge would accept any cases, The SoS blocked sharing of any election data. He even sent armed SoS police to locations to stifle things.
Georgia was undoubtedly stolen.
If you take a few minutes to read the two exceprts I posted above, you ll see how right you are…or maybe you had read that article already.
Either way you are right, judges rejected cases and thus no one ever looked at the evidence
but the left and their media call this “winning in court and proving there was no fraud” but that is a lie, no one ever looked at the evidence.