Justice Ketanji Jackson, who doesn’t know what a woman is and protects pedophiles, wants nationwide injunctions because, without them, the Executive would no longer have to “move quickly” to reclaim its Article II powers. In other words, she argues that we want district court judges to block Trump’s agenda to get the actual case to the nine Supreme Court lawyers faster.
Okay, then.
“I would think we’d want the system to move as quickly as possible,” Ketanji said, “to reach the merits of the issue, and maybe have this court decide whether or not the government is entitled to do this under the law.
“Wouldn’t having universal injunctions actually facilitate that. It seems to me that when the government is completely enjoined from doing the thing it wants to do, it moves quickly to appeal that to get it to the Supreme Court. And that’s actually what we would want.
“What I worry about is similar to what Justice Kagan points out is that if the government is saying no lower court can completely enjoin it, it actually means that the government just keeps on doing the purportedly unlawful thing, and it delays the ability for this court to reach the underlying issue.”
Ketanji wants minor lawyers in robes to control the Executive. Aside from her illogic, how does that affect the separation of powers?
After listening to this, would you say she has the higher intellectual ability worthy of the Court?
Kentaji Brown Jackson just argued that nationwide injunctions by district court judges to block Trump’s agenda “is actually what we would want.”
Completely insane. pic.twitter.com/Mj6z3Sh0Eo
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) May 15, 2025
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Kentanji Jackson performed on Broadway while acting as a judge on the Supreme Court. Now only did she disrespect her judicial position but she embarrassed Americans with her stupid performance. We need to remove Jackson, Conehead Barrett and all the members of this court except Alito and Thomas.
There are brilliant women that I really like, for example Harriet Hageman, but there are also dumb women, like those 4 women on the Supreme court.
Yesterday I listened to short audios of Kagan, Barrett and Jackson , and all three not only don t present very logical arguments but they kept interrupting – impolitely – John Saur who is the most polite man ever !
And I know why they did that.
John Saur is a sort of genius in his field, that man is a walking talking encyclopedia as far as US law is concerned, and he is freakin brilliant, so those women when they were seeing that he was about to destroy – easily – their weak arguments, they quickly, very impolitely interrupted him to make sure he could not finish what he was saying.
Those women know that he is outsmarting them, all 4 of them, so they constantly interrupt him, which is a sort of censorship; he was never able to finish a sentence, was never able to fully present the facts and the logic of his point.
That behavior shows that those women are too weak to be on the Supreme court.
That is not all, Saur is extremely polite, he addressed them as if they were royalty, he is a class act, but those women talked to him like he was nothing, for example Kagan repeated about 4 times that Him and Trump never win any case, and she said it with a tone that reminds me of when kids taunt another kid because he is fat or has a big nose or something…
Those women are not intelligent enough nor do they have enough class to be there, they are degrading, cheapening what used to be the most respected court on this planet.
I doubt if this worthless being would believe this if Harris had won and conservative leaning courts blocked her agenda.
Seemingly ‘biology’ is NOT her only ‘failing grade’…
Well if that is her opinion, than any nation wide injunctions must be in front of the Supreme Court within 72 hours. No delays or holidays.