MSNBC Only Showed the Prosecutor’s Closing Argument, Not the Defense’s

6
992

Yesterday, YouTube shut down independent live coverage of the closing statements of the prosecution and defense. They obviously didn’t like the commentary. They even shut down Law & Crime.

That was followed by MSNBC airing only the prosecution’s closing argument.

Fox News reported, MSNBC skipped the Rittenhouse’s defense closing argument after airing the prosecution’s.

CNN did return to the defense’s closing argument, but missed the first hour of it, according to reports.

The excuse to do that was to switch to Biden signing the enormous spending bill.

After the Biden ceremony, MSNBC returned to its regular programming with “Deadline: White House” hosted by Nicolle Wallace, who focused on former Trump strategist Steve Bannon’s surrendering to the FBI for two counts of contempt of Congress. It is the first time in history someone has been indicted on that charge amid a claim of executive privilege, Newsmax has reported.

The jury went into deliberations about 9:45 this morning. There were 18 jurors but the attorney and defendant got to pick the 6 to be excluded by random from a raffle drum who would actually deliberate. A man of color is among the 12.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tmorgan75
Guest
tmorgan75
2 years ago

Why is so much time devoted to pointing out the stupid things said on MSNBC? Since clearly it’s only stupid people watching MSNBC, is there concern that they can be made even more stupid than they already are? How?

Bart Tuben
Guest
Bart Tuben
2 years ago

If you set fires, damage property, or injure anyone, you get shot. Easy, peasy. Issue a warning, wait for the answer… and, if necessary, shoot.

timshep
Guest
timshep
2 years ago

What else is new? This is what these propagandists do skew the facts and the truth.

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
2 years ago

The DA has Zero Credibility. Where are the Literally Hundreds of Trials for the Riots and Arsonist? What we are seeing is a concept being pushed that Liberals can burn cities down when they are upset about something and Law Abiding Conservatives have to stand around and watch, then rebuild the City for the Liberal Losers.

What I really worry about is the Jury might be inclined to sacrifice this kid because they are worried about more riots. If you want to stop riots, then you make the rioters understand that if they riot death is a likely outcome. Liberals are Losers and we should not enable them!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
2 years ago

They are trying to incite a riot. Their fingers are crossed. Once more they confirm that they enemies of the people.