Paul Pelosi Attack Evolves Yet Again Until One Story Sticks

17
536

We have little idea of what happened to Paul Pelosi. The stories are crazy. We believe he was hit in the head with a hammer at least once by a man named David DePape. He underwent brain surgery to close his skull. We think that’s true too. Mr. Pelosi is supposed to recover fully, and we are happy to hear that.

The police scanner seems accurate, maybe, perhaps. The officer says the reporting person didn’t know the man in his house, but the man, named David, said he was a friend and wanted to wait for Nancy.

The story about the underwear is now said to be false, and a third person letting the police in is debunked by the police. We don’t know who let the police in. Maybe they came through the open door in the back. [This paragraph was updated at 7:00 pm 10-30]

Other than that, we believe nothing we hear.

The latest from Fox News is that DePape had zip-ties and a hammer. He struggled with 82-year-old Paul with the hammer. DePape is a conspiracy theorist, and his ex-life partner, Oxane Taub, says he’s “mentally ill.”

Fox added that Taub is a jailed nudist activist convicted on child abduction charges. She says she raised two sons with DePape and her daughter from a previous relationship. She split with him seven years ago.

When he came back after disappearing for a year, he thought he was Jesus, Taub said. “He was constantly paranoid, thinking people were after him. And it took a good year or two to get back to, you know, being halfway normal,” Taub said.

The Fox report also said White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre compared it to Jan. 6. That needs some fact-checking.

The media claimed the Jan. 6 attacker had zip ties also, and it wasn’t true, so we have some healthy skepticism about the zip ties. CBS said he also had duct tape. Fact-checkers, please. We need more information. Let’s hear from the police.

The Left immediately blamed the Right for the attack based on QAnon posts DePape allegedly made two weeks ago. Journalists agreed.

The NY Post wrote about that which the media has not:

But DePape’s politics have little rhyme or reason. In past years DePape shared a post about Stephen Colbert’s 2006 roast of President George W. Bush at the White House Correspondents dinner; linked to videos of Disney films altered to make it look like the characters were swearing; and claimed, “Jesus is the anti-Christ” — not exactly a litany of right-wing tropes.

If DePape is now right wing, he’s very confused since he’s always been left wing.

And, as I soon discovered, DePape lived with a notorious local nudist in a Berkeley home, complete with a Black Lives Matter sign in the window and an LGBT rainbow flag, emblazoned with a marijuana symbol, hanging from a tree. A closer look reveals the characteristics of a homeless encampment, or what Europeans call “an open drug scene.” In the driveway, there is a broken-down camper van. On the street is a yellow school bus, which neighbors said DePape occasionally stayed in. Both are filled with garbage, typical of such structures in homeless encampments. People come and go from the house and the vehicles, neighbors say, in part to partake in the use of a potent psychedelic drug, ibogaine.

He is a homeless addict who exhibits paranoid psychotic behavior:

Neighbors described DePape as a homeless addict with politics that was, until recently, left-wing, but of secondary importance to his psychotic and paranoid behavior.

“What I know about the family is that they’re very radical activists,” said one of DePape’s neighbors, a woman who only gave her first name, Trish. “They seem very left. They are all about the Black Lives Matter movement. Gay pride. But they’re very detached from reality. They have called the cops on several of the neighbors, including us, claiming that we are plotting against them. It’s really weird to see that they are willing to be so aggressive toward somebody else who is also a lefty.”

If you go to The NY Post, some of the media got some of the story right, but no one reported fairly. They also described more of the chaos. This is crazy stuff.


PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jazzfusionary
Guest
jazzfusionary
1 year ago

1. Why was alarm shut off and where’s the footage of numerous security cameras in a gated community?
2. House security wasn’t available, meaning they were dismissed during “date night.”
3. Despite MSM screaming it was a break in, Police didn’t state or charge DePape with breaking in.
4. Evidently DePape “let” Pelosi go to the bathroom (which is most likely a huge bedroom) where he would have been safe but left to confront DePape? 
3. In the bathroom Pelosi called the San Fran PD who said he spoke in code when there was no code Pelosi called the attacker “David”
4. The police spokeman said that both men were in their underwear “Our officers observed Mr. Pelosi and the suspect both holding a hammer” Was it one hammer or were they each holding their own hammer?  
5. Why did DePape wait for police to show up to attack and how was DePape injured?
6. The 3rd person who opened the door is now erased from the report.  
7. All we have for the “Where’s Nancy” statement of the attacker was the word of people who lie to us on a regular basis.
8. FAKE websites/posts making #DavidDepape look like a conservative QAnon supporter, went up on
Friday and removed on Saturday
9. WHY a charge of #ElderAbuse – which means this is a caretaker relationship
10. At this point, all the evidence leads to DePape being Pelosi’s gay lover and drugs where 
used which took the situation out of control.

Last edited 1 year ago by jazzfusionary
Harrison Pendleton
Guest
Harrison Pendleton
1 year ago

All that should be known is that two of society’s disgustingly depraved men went at it, first sekually than violently. Both are unholy filth as is the Parasite Pelosi woman. That democrats and other assorted filth came out from under their white privilege white elitists rocks to distract from their widespread Joe Biden crimes is typical for them: DISTRACT AND DENY. The only policies they hold dear.

Last edited 1 year ago by Harrison Pendleton
Canadian Friend
Guest
Canadian Friend
1 year ago

The police changed their story, and now say there was not a third person, but initially they said ( and said it spontaneously as when you are simply telling the truth, spontaneously as when it is not a prepared lie… I watched that video 3 times ) that when they got there a person opened the door to them and they saw trough the open door two men struggling over a hammer.

They did not say the person who opened the door then went to go fight Mr Pelosi.

The way they described it intially was that one person opened the door and further away from the door two men were fighting.

There was a third person.

The fact they deny it now means nothing.

Police, like the media lie all the time to cover for politicians or filthy rich people.

The Prisoner
Guest
The Prisoner
1 year ago

Most of the article covers smearing the obviously bad character of the visitor to the Pelosi home.

The 3rd person in the house no longer exists:

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott indicated there was a third person during a press conference on Friday evening when he recounted details of what occurred when police arrived on the scene.

This alteration of evidence cannot be innocent.

Zigmont
Guest
Zigmont
1 year ago
Reply to  The Prisoner

Yeah, third person who let the police in, then after Nancy arrives from D.C.there wasn’t a third person, HHHMMM

The Prisoner
Guest
The Prisoner
1 year ago

How is the police scanner accurate, we do not have the actual Pelosi call. And if he made that call from the bathroom, that means the other guy allowed him to leave the room, so there was not a fight at that time.

What about the other guy’s injuries? Why is there no interest in that? Since he is in the hospital, he was severely injured too, by Pelosi. The police reported Pelosi also held the hammer, maybe they will change that too.

Why haven’t the Pelosis released the security videos? Because no break in is on them. They are rich, in a neighborhood adjacent to crimes. They have a security system. Cameras encircle the house. A broken door/window would have immediately triggered an alarm, to the police. The security staff outside that house is visible 7×24. That man did not break in. Pelosi did not report a break in on the call.

Nancy also is concealing the J6 videos which show the police beating people and also ushering people into the building, with antifa and others staging an attack.

The obvious changes in the story are symptomatic of every coverup. First the police entered the first floor and saw the fight there, a 3rd person let them in. Later, the fight was on the 3rd floor and there was no 3rd person. These kinds of changes are not innocent.

[If one cannot recognize the symptoms of a coverup, then one continually is fooled. For example, “safe and effective” fake “vaccines”. Those mRNA injections were never officially declared to prevent infection and transmission. Experts involved in creating the technology said the jabs were not as claimed. But people that do not fall for the media landslide, and object to the fraud, should be “ashamed” of themselves.]