Psychos Look to Nuclear War

4

Navy Admiral Charles Richard, commander of US Strategic Command, declared on Wednesday that the US might face nuclear war with a peer-level opponent for the first time since the end of the Cold War.

Charles A. Richard

At an Air Force-organized conference in Maryland, Richard claimed that the US would have to prepare to escalate quickly against possible opponents and protect its homeland.

“All of us in this room are back in the business of contemplating…direct armed conflict with a nuclear-capable peer,” he said, according to a Pentagon summary of his comments. “We have not had to do that in over 30 years.”

This is no longer theoretical.

“Russia and China can escalate to any level of violence they choose in any domain with any instrument of power worldwide,” he continued. “We just haven’t faced competitors and opponents like that in a long time.”

We remember how they surrendered to primitive thugs in Afghanistan. Now, US officials nonchalantly talk about nuclear war instead of diplomacy and mediation.

In April, when Ukraine and Russia brokered a tentative ceasefire, NATO – the US – sent Boris Johnson to Ukraine to kill the deal. The comedian president obliged.

The US decided they would overturn the Russian government, not even knowing what would come of it. Those who are in line to take over are worse than Putin. What good would it do unless they plan further offenses?

This Admiral is talking as if nuclear war is feasible and winnable. It’s not.  This war needs to end with a forced peace agreement.

Volodymyr Zelensky’s top aide has called for the West to pre-emptively nuke Russia.

“The other nuclear states need to say very firmly that as soon as Russia even thinks of carrying out nuclear strikes on foreign territory – in this case, the territory of Ukraine – there will be swift retaliatory nuclear strikes to destroy the nuclear launch sites in Russia,” said Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior aide to Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, in an interview at the presidential administration in Kyiv.

He wants Russia punished, and he’s stupid enough to want the West to risk complete destruction to do it.

Col. Douglas MacGregor was on ‘Tucker’ Thursday night and explained that Ukraine is already beaten.

Putin has concluded that he can’t negotiate with Kiev because Washington won’t allow it.

He knows there have been discussions in DC for months about a limited nuclear war. Putin said they would respond if the US used nuclear weapons. His comments about nukes were in response to our threats and Zelensky calling for the use of nukes. He is saying he will respond.

Watch:

Corrections: Zelensky’s top aide’s comments were added after publication.


PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Prisoner
The Prisoner
6 days ago

This is very good, some key things to know:

We remember how they surrendered to primitive thugs in Afghanistan. Now, US officials nonchalantly talk about nuclear war instead of diplomacy and mediation.

In April, when Ukraine and Russia brokered a tentative ceasefire, NATO – the US – sent Boris Johnson to Ukraine to kill the deal. The comedian president obliged.

Richard is the Walensky of the military. They both claim that can save us from great dangers which they created, with their huge corrupt industry complexes.

GuvGeek
GuvGeek
6 days ago

Contrary to Popular Belief a Nuclear War against the United States can be won – at least a limited Nuclear War. President Trump actually understood this! The Question is, “How Far Gone is Joe Biden?” At this point we are dealing with a Proxy War in a Country without Nuclear Weapons. Drop a Nuclear Warhead on Russian Territory and Russia will most likely light up Europe; taking out most of the World Economic Forum Cult. If we retaliate, figure that Russia will take out most of the East Coast and China will take out the West Coast.

Large population Centers are prime targets. Financial Centers are prime targets. If things go rouge then Military Bases, Command and Control, and Satellites will disappear. Without Satellites, our Military is all but dead in the Water. Taking out Strategic Ports, Farmland, Mining, and Manufacturing areas will be a last resort. There is no logic in destroying useful assets, just breaking the Will of your Enemy is the logical goal of a War so you can use their resources. Nuclear War against the United States is winnable because we are not prepared to deal with a Nuclear War and most of the America population lives on less than 5% of America’s land, primarily along the East and West Coast. If you are 50 Miles from Ground Zero and prepared, even a large Nuclear Blast is highly survivable. This is a reason I live more than 50 Miles from targets of opportunity. Dealing with fallout would be easier than dealing with Covid – if prepared.

Even a Limited Nuclear War will not be pretty. Europe will be 10 times more devastated in 72 hours than in all of WWII. ALL of NYC will look like the twin Towers. At this moment in time we are closer to Nuclear War than we were during the Cuban Missile Crisis! Joe Biden got us here! Democrats didn’t even try to stop him! And neither did the RINOs.

Last edited 6 days ago by GuvGeek
Blank
Blank
7 days ago

“This Admiral is talking as if nuclear war is feasible and winnable. It’s not. This war needs to end with a forced peace agreement.”

The reason the top brass in our military can so casually proffer nuclear war as a legitimate plan of action under any circumstances (even in these, where the circumstances are entirely of the creation OF THE US, by way of its provoking this altercation between Russia and Ukraine for its own sadistic purposes), is because most of the people of this country are so abysmally dumbed down that the phrase “nuclear war” means little to them in terms of reality. It is doubtful anyone under 50 has ever been taught anything about it. Go ahead, try asking them what “Hiroshima” means to them. You’ll get a blank stare, and observe an immediate effort to look it up on their cell phones. “How do you spell it?”

Greg
Greg
7 days ago

Ah, the first article that accurately portrays Putin’s remarks concerning a nuclear response. Many are claiming Putin threatened to go nuclear in Ukraine without any provocation.

The threats of the West to destabilize Russia began in the 50’s and contemplated using nuclear weapons in conjunction with all of NATO. The purpose was to break up Russia into separate territories. We are hearing the US speak again in those terms. The West simply does not want to admit that Putin views NATO as an existential threat to Russia. These past few months have confirmed his concerns.

The West will claim NATO is a “defensive” organization but it’s history proves otherwise. They have no hesitation in toppling governments across the globe. The purpose in arming Ukraine was to effect the fall of Putin. Our military boldly stated this aim. Putin is doing what the West did with the breakup resulting in Kosovo, but Putin isn’t following the West’s “rules based order“, which means, when we do it, it’s okay.

It’s all done in the “name” of democracy, which can be said is the last refuge of the scoundrels. What is meant by that democracy is the promotion of L)ets G)et B)iden T)o Q)uit. Recently the West has been more explicit in declaring that to be the case. In that respect, Putin is a Traditionalist. He basically says the degradation of society is the destruction of a country, and we can see the evidence of that all over this country.