Bryan Llenas, National Correspondent for Fox News, said another shot was taken of the would-be assassin Thomas Crooks on July 13 by a local sniper team. The information came from his source, which was anonymous.
The difference is there were two snipers instead of two assassins, and three guns were used.
“A source familiar with investigation tells me a USSS counter sniper took the shot that killed Thomas Crooks. He could only see Crooks’ scope and top of his eye / forehead because of the lip of the roof. The source described the shot to me as a “one in a million shot.” Another shot was taken by local sniper team but that one missed,” Llenas wrote on X.
If true that there was a local counter sniper team, it might account for the extra gunshot heard in an audio analysis.
It still doesn’t explain why Donald Trump was allowed to speak, and the audience was not warned. Why wasn’t that building secured and the grounds checked?
The shot was not taken by the counter sniper team photographer that day.
— Bryan Llenas (@BryanLlenas) July 20, 2024
Two sniper teams, rather than one, explains some of Sen. Johnson’s concerns, but is the Fox correspondent’s source telling the truth now, or is this part of a cover-up?
If the administration would just provide information and tell the truth, we wouldn’t have to guess at what the truth is, and so-called conspiracy theories wouldn’t arise.
THE COVER UP
This is the full video. The FBI said to put photos of the scent to the ATF???!!!
At 4:27 of the video, Johnson outlines how an anonymous man instructed law enforcement to send pictures of deceased Thomas Matthew Crooks to a phone number presumably connected to the ATF.
There is more nutty stuff in this clip.
We can’t have another Warren Commission set up to cover up.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Maura, We haven’t spoken in quite awhile; but I just wanted to tell you that your site gets better and better! There’s really nothing else like your insights and observations out there.
Related,
I found a clear picture of the water tower
I don t see anything on the top that could be mistaken for a man.
Maybe people in the crowd are wrong, maybe there was no man up there, but on the pic there is nothing that looks remotely like a man.
You are looking very silly, again. Some agency feeds some junk reporter another story and that somehow explains away the acoustics, when we will never get the ballistics. Wrong. The acoustic analysis has them in a panic.
Had we seen a photo of the empty casings near Crooks’ body and how many there were, we would know how many shots he fired.
Unfortunately we will have to rely on people who are known to lie a lot ( Russia Russia, Hunter’s laptop etc etc )
Maybe there was two snipers, but if it was a second assassin they would obviously not admit to that, they would explain it as ; “oh just another sniper that is all !”
We did see a photo of the FBI(?)/CIA(?)/USSS(?) washing off the roof (and evidence?) of the building Crooks fired from. Whatever happened to preserving a crime scene?
JFK, Oswald, Ruby . . .
Trump, Cook, Ruby