SCOTUS Rules on the Domestic Abuse Gun Case

1
63

The gun case that people fear will limit Bruen concerns a violent, dangerous man who is now imprisoned. There is no way the man in question, Mr. Rahimi, should have a gun.

The concern was that upholding the domestic abuse law could open the way for vindictive spouses to demand guns be taken from the husband or wife they don’t like.  The law has been used loosely in some cases.

There are other laws to keep that man in prison and from getting a gun.

However, it is not a problem in this case since it is narrowly defined and does not endorse red flag laws, which, in my non-legal opinion, are unconstitutional.

Jonathan Turley said it’s bad for Hunter.

Prof. Turley said it might affect the Manhattan Trump-Bragg case.


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark Richardson
Mark Richardson
11 months ago

“No rights under the second amendment are absolute”
Is that right?
Then what rights do we have?
None.
These rights are self evident, and handed down from God.
Not issued selectively.

Last edited 11 months ago by Mark Richardson