Watch this short clip about Stephen Miller’s stunning prediction in 2003 when he was a Freshman at Duke. Miller was a student at Duke from 2003 to 2007.
While talking to a retired professor, Hines Goemans, PhD, a radio host at WXXinews in Rochester, NY, finds out that Miller was his former student, who told the professor he wanted to be number two in the White House in the next 15 years. When asked who the president would be, Miller said, “Donald Trump, maybe.”
“The guy is very smart.”
I confused cases.
In the Zimmerman case it was Bondi that completely got it wrong, indicating deficient cognition, since the police decided on no prosecution, and the facts were clear.
In the Duke case, the facts were as clear, and Miller got it right, though not in an official role with the ability to see all evidence.
It has to be torture for someone of the ability of Miller to see someone with no ability like Bondi defy the Trump agenda.
I hadn’t heard this. Miller is smart but he got lucky with his speculation.
In 2006, Miller made a name for himself by vocally attacking the Duke LaCrosse indictments. He figured it out quickly. He was in the media often talking about it. The accuser’s friend was present at the event and refused to corroborate her fake story. She criticized the accuser. That was a dead giveaway. But Bondi did not figure it out. She charged the men, and the assigned prosecutor used a witness that perjured herself. The case failed badly.
I can imagine how Miller feels now, with the inept and ill intended Bondi soaking up limelight and stalling badly needed actions.
Are your comments about Bondi a deliberate lie?
“Michael B. Nifong, the Durham County District Attorney, prosecuted the 2006 Duke lacrosse case, ultimately leading to his disbarment in June 2007 for withholding exculpatory DNA evidence and making false statements.
No, I will correct it.
I confused the Duke case with the Zimmerman case. But the principle still applies.
Comments are closed.