Tesla Showroom Terrorist Will Face 20 Years in Prison

18
4448

A man who threw a Molotov Cocktail into a Tesla showroom is under arrest and AG Bondi said he will face 20 years in prison. He could have killed someone, not to minimize the property damage.

An Oregon man accused of trying to destroy property at a Tesla dealership in Salem twice since January has been arraigned on federal charges, according to court documents obtained Nexstar’s KOIN.

Pam Bondi will also go after the funders of the Tesla violence. Let’s hope for Kamala’s sake, she stopped funding violent radicals.

Go to 5:49:

 


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
4 2 votes
Article Rating
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kat
kat
2 months ago

Dear Pam, You have lots more important fish to fry. GET AT IT!! This kind of trifling only makes you look worse..

Sua Sponte
Sua Sponte
3 months ago

Yeah, ok, great…..Where’s the fricken’ Epstein list?

joe
joe
3 months ago

I might potentially posit the notion that someone . somewhere could conceivably
give a rat’s patoot concerning this obvious non-issue. Then again, I might not.
Ur thoughts?

Glee
Glee
3 months ago

There is no excuse or need for SCOTUS to affirm the constitutionally enumerated powers of the presidency, as agreed upon by the DOJ…None. Trump needs to make an executive order that says this:

  1. The Executive Branch is a SEPARATE AND EQUAL Branch of Government. Henceforth it will execute the authority vested in it by the Constitution and affirmed by precedence, under the oversight and advisement of the DOJ and without interference by the Judicial Branch.
  2. If a lower court feels an Executive Power has been breached, it may petition SCOTUS directly for review.
  3. If SCOTUS determines a 3-branch consideration is needed, the DOJ will establish a 6-panel committee, with two representatives each from the three EQUAL branches—SCOTUS, The DOJ, and the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  4. If the Committee determines an Executive Power has been exceeded, SCOTUS will fast-track a review by the Supreme Court justices AND/OR Congress will immediately address changes to and/or clarity the law through the legislation process so that executive progress is not unduly impeded.
  5. Henceforth, the Administrative a branch will not entertain, acknowledge, or be hindered by any lower court interference with Executive Authority and its associated powers belonging to it by the Constitution.

Make SCOTUS stay in its lane, sir. Anything less is eroding the balance of power.

Sputnik
Sputnik
3 months ago

Double it!

Glee
Glee
3 months ago

Why, Why, WHY is the SEPARATE and EQUAL Executive Branch looking to SCOTUS to make a decision that is Not, Not, NOT under the authority of the Judicial Branch…not even SCOTUS? If Executive Authority are powers granted by the constitution and affirmed by precedence as belonging to the Executive Branch, and the Executive Branch automatically looks to SCOTUS for “permission,” then the Executive Branch is neither separate nor EQUAL and the balance of power is broken. That is, no branch can be both subordinate to another branch AND equal to it. Nonsense.

Mrs. Sunshine
Mrs. Sunshine
3 months ago

Without a link to the indictment, and no information whatsoever about the suspect, this is fake news.

Mrs. Sunshine
Mrs. Sunshine
3 months ago
Reply to  M Dowling

In your article you refer to “arrest” and “indictment”. When you use those terms, you must include some semblance of names, pictures, indictment info, arrest record data, etc.

When you use those terms without the corresponding data written in the article, it makes your article highly suspect. Without that data, your article is not ready for publication.

Mrs. Sunshine
Mrs. Sunshine
3 months ago
Reply to  M Dowling

Your job is to find the information. Not just repeat incomplete information by a person, Bondi, that so far has been less then stellar.

Bondi misled about Epstein files is one example showing that she can’t be trusted. I want her to do well but so far she’s been a huge disappointment.

Bondi might be lying. Your job as a journalist is to find out if Bondi is telling the full truth and call her out if she isn’t.

The Prisoner
The Prisoner
3 months ago
Reply to  Mrs. Sunshine

Your sophistry will not work here. This site publishes quick and important news.

Bondi is not performing well. These vandalism crimes are local matters unless the DOJ creates a federal case.

MD decides what her job is, not you. News informs us, we cannot expect absolute clarity.

The Prisoner
The Prisoner
3 months ago
Reply to  Mrs. Sunshine

That is such a weak argument, we highly suspect you oppose justice.

This article reports Bondi’s statements.

IS sets the standard here for itself, as is done with free speech. You do not set the standard.

The Prisoner
The Prisoner
3 months ago
Reply to  Mrs. Sunshine

This is not a legal journal.