The Media Fails on Springfield, Ohio

12
822

Do journalists all work from home now? Why don’t they get to Springfield and find out what is happening before writing their stories?

The media claims the story about Haitian immigrants eating cats, dogs, and ducks is a lie, even though people who live there say it’s true. Anything that interferes with their policies and their open borders must be dismissed.

The real story isn’t about the animals; it’s about 20,000 unvetted, uneducated people pouring into a town with 60,000 people from the worst country in the world. There are bound to be problems.

Nick Freitas wrote in the attached X post:

ABC: “We called the city manager, and he said that’s not happening.”

That sentence perfectly describes the modern media.

Multiple reports by citizens claiming something is happening and the media “investigation” stops as soon as a bureaucrat tells them what they want to hear.

Today’s media doesn’t research, investigate, or speak with the people involved. It’s more about messages they want to send to please those who pay their salaries.

Meanwhile, the people in our cities and small towns are suffering.

What happened to the Springfield residents is happening in New York City, Aurora, El Paso, Chicago, and all over the country, but reporters deny it.

City officials deny the animal eating, but they denied it in Aurora, and now we find out it’s true. Reporters need to go back to talking to the people involved instead of just spouting the politically expedient narrative.

This man said he saw Haitians with a vanload of cats, and they were eating them. If we had a real media, we’d know the truth by now.

Everything isn’t okay in Springfield:


Subscribe to the Daily Newsletter

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
12 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments