It is very troubling to see the continued lies, exaggerations, and twisting of Charlie’s words in the media. The predictions of what he would say are a waste of time. A monster murdered him and he can’t tell us. That being said, there are theories arising over the bullet. Andrew Kolvet has a response for the bullet theory and Alex Jones isn’t buying it.
Andrew Kolvet is the producer of Charlie’s show and a close friend of his and the family’s. He has permission of everyone to post the following.
The Miraculous Bullet
Mr. Kolvet’s full statement:
I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know.
I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital…
He said the bullet “absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high powered, high velocity round. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.”
But it didn’t go through. Charlie’s body stopped it.
I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent, and he replied:
“It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed.”
“His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.”
In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin.
Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him.
Remarkable. Miraculous.
To sum up his statement, he has permission to share these details from everyone, which would include Erika Kirk. He said the coroner found the bullet just beneath the skin and by rights, it should have gone through his body. It didn’t. If it had, it could have killed the people behind Charlie. That is what Andrew Kolvet calls miraculous.
As a sidenote, Megyn Kelly said on her show that the bullet first hit Charlie’s bulletproof vest and ricocheted into his neck. That could be the answer. In any case, other lives were not lost.
I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably…
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 20, 2025
The Magic Bullet
Alex Jones referred to it as a magic bullet, but the family didn’t call it that. He also said Charlie is Superman and a man of steel, but he meant it sardonically. Andrew Kolvet didn’t say that exactly. He said it was miraculous and Charlie’s bones were very strong.
Jones isn’t buying this. However, if Andrew has Erika’s permission, I have to go with him. As Jones said, we need to follow the evidence. Jones feels we are being lied to. He talks about the 30-06 round. It would take a miracle for Charlie’s neck to stop it.
However, if Megyn Kelly is right and it bounced off his vest, if he was indeed wearing one, it could slow the bullet if it hit at a sharp angle. A 30-06 is a jacketed bullet which is more likely to ricochet than a hollow point.
I understand Jones’s skepticism here, but as long as Erika is backing Andrew on this, I’m going with her. It’s the best evidence available. It’s also easy to understand skepticism after all the lies we have been told and that continues to this day, but I want to believe Andrew and Erika.
I don’t follow Alex Jones, but he is the most visible person speaking out about the bullet.
Here is what Jones is saying:
TPUSA is now reporting that Charlie Kirk was shot by a magic bullet: TPUSA Spokesman Andrew Kolvet is now officially claiming that a high caliber rifle designed for moose hunting did not shoot all the way through Charlie Kirk’s neck. Then it only gets worse. He then goes on to… https://t.co/pZywEnvDdw pic.twitter.com/ZYKqjsN4SU
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) September 21, 2025
Correction: For some inexplicable reason, we wrote the weapon used was a shotgun when it clearly was an old bolt-action rifle.
First and foremost, does the bullet, which has never been mentioned before by officials, or in the indictments, match the gun?
Candace Owens is the only one with the courage to do real investigative work. She gets attacked, because she does not bow down to Israel. After she disclosed there is no wound in back, then suddenly we get this “bullet stayed inside” story. Owens made the major breakthrough so far. But, she gets no credit here.
Suddenly, Andrew Kolvet comes to the rescue, with his story. I already had no trust in him, since he delivered the videos from all angles to the FBI quickly. Those videos should have been copied before given to anyone. The FBI is where evidence goes to die.
He was not wearing a vest, his nipples are showing. Megyn is a gossip reporter.
It’s a powerful round, it can go through 1/4 inch steel or a moose.
With the ballistics evidence, we can speculate on options. But, suggesting other options, in the midst of officials withholding information, does not make one crazy.
Perhaps the bullets were reloads and the charge was less than sufficient, causing the slug to travel slower. A normal factory bullet should have exited.
“The killer used a shotgun and bulletproof vests are not generally made for them.”
No, he used a Mauser bolt action rifle in 30-06 caliber.
“A 30-06 is a jacketed bullet which is more likely to ricochet than a hollow point.”
You are an idiot, who hasn’t ever fired a weapon. Every single sporting goods outlet sells jacketed hollow point rounds for a 30-06. What do you think hunters use?
30-06 is one of the most popular rounds ,made in lead tip, jacketed hollow point ,round nose, all metal jacket and in weights from 125gr , 150gr, 180gr and more.
Hunters normally use a bonded lead bullet or an interlock or even a tipped all copper bullet. I didn’t see which the article said the shooter used . All can and will ricochet . There is no reason to talk down to a person anyone can get things wrong nobody is perfect
Thanks
I can understand no exit wound if he were shot in the body but the neck is very small in dia. Any 30-06 cartridge would have at least 16” of penetration. If the shooter was using a very old cartridge that had been exposed to adverse conditions it may have weakened it to that point but a bad cartridge would have left the rifle (or a sideways one ) would have caused the flight of the bullet to be extremely different from its intended path making it almost impossible to hit the target. To me the only thing that would make sense is for the bullet to hit something very close to him and then hit him.
A vest or a pole, part of the structure around him
If not none of this makes sense
My personal experience with deer hunting each year using a 270 (necked down 30-06)
6.5 creedmoore and a 6arc all are less powerful than a 30-06 but still penetrate more than can be contained in his neck
Before people go off the deep end, might want to understand ballistics first. Factoring in angles, bullet weight, wind, temperature, powder load of the cartridge, temperature of the firearm when fired, etc.. And the “oh this is designed to take down an elk!! is irrelevant. Just because someone is shot, does not always equal an exit wound. There are multiple factors involved in why it may not have passed through. Jumping to conclusions doesn’t help and only fosters wild theories. I’ve seen instances of individuals hit in the shoulder and the bullet ends up in their leg.
No human neck stops a .30-06 round and absorbs all its energy with no exit wound. Never happened, never will. The physics and anatomy make it impossible. Nobody is Wolverine, and Charlie isn’t Superman.
The math ain’t mathin, in other words.
Oh, I didn’t know we had all the specifics across the board at this point.
Thanks for not being gullible.
Since there seems to be no wound in back, the possibility of a shot from the front is greatly reduced. So now they have the version in which the bullet was going downhill so turned downwards into the body. But that was only a 5 degree angle! He was 450 feet away and less then 30 feet up! it was nearly a straight entry if from where they say it came from.
Plus, the doctor says the bullet was just inside the skin. If it turned down, it would not be.
I don’t know that much about firearms, and what I know is from videos on youtube, where they do tests in ballistic gel…..
but occasionally a bullet may be unstable and turn sideways , and when it hits the target sideways, it makes a larger hole but the bullet does not travel as far inside the target…..
Maybe that is what happened…..
It would explain why there is no exit wound…..
update; I asked copilot and it turns out my theory is not crazy at all,
it says;
—Loss of stability: As a bullet travels through the air, it can become unstable, especially over long distances or if it strikes an intermediate object like a branch.
—Insufficient rifling: A “shot out” or worn-down barrel may not impart enough spin to the bullet, causing it to tumble in flight.
—Impact with a target: The dense, elastic nature of living tissue can cause a bullet to decelerate and become unstable, forcing it to tumble and release its energy
Was not the rifle a very old one ? it may have had a worn out barrel…which would make the bullet unstable and hit the target sideways…
I am no expert but the explanation of why there was no exit wound may be as simple as that.
Most of the time an unstable bullet will not fly straight but will lose stability and not stay on its intended path but unless he was a very good marksman hitting his neck was pure luck even if everything was perfect
Why are they cementing over the spot where his tent was ???
Comments are closed.