The Supreme Court didn’t rule for pollution — it ruled for democracy
by Betsy McCaughey
Despite its name, the Democratic Party has no time for democracy. Especially when it comes to battling climate change, Democrats say public opinion and democracy be damned.
Last month, the Supreme Court struck down an Environmental Protection Agency plan compelling states to shutter coal plants and shift to low-carbon alternatives like natural gas and wind. The justices ruled 6-3 in West Virginia v. EPA that it’s up to Congress — the people’s elected representatives — to answer “major questions” like whether the federal government should shut down coal-fired power plants and demand states adopt other ways of generating electricity.
The EPA’s plan, devised during the Obama presidency, was an end-run around Congress.
Democrats and their media toadies are bashing the court’s ruling, labeling it “catastrophic.” No charge is too extreme. Rep. Jamaal Bowman says the court is “killing America.”
Sen. Chuck Schumer rails the ruling will lead to “needless deaths” from pollution. Sorry, Senator, the court did not rule in favor of pollution. It ruled for democracy, calling on you and other members of Congress to roll up your sleeves and do your jobs.
Chief Justice John Roberts explained, “Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible solution,” but only Congress can make a “decision of such magnitude.” Roberts pointed out that Congress had considered such a drastic move and rejected it.
The New York Times laments that the Biden administration will be forced to “double down” on persuading Congress to eliminate coal-powered electricity generation. Democracy is so inconvenient.
Ten states are heavily dependent on coal-fired plants, including West Virginia, Wyoming, Missouri, Kentucky, and Utah. Those pesky flyover states again.
Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson is melting down into hysteria, claiming America can’t wait for Congress to act. Robinson wants the unelected, unaccountable federal bureaucracy to shut the plants down. So much for the consent of the governed.
Fact is, states are already decarbonizing their electric grids and moving to wind and solar at an alarming pace. Alarming because renewables are not yet adequate to meet demand during summer heat waves, according to a recent Federal Regulatory Energy Commission report. Some parts of the country could be hit with blackouts and energy price hikes as high as 233% this summer. Those boosts will make the prices at the pump look reasonable by comparison.
That’s why energy-policy decisions should be made by the people’s elected representatives, who have to balance climate and cost — and face voters on Election Day.
Bureaucrats couldn’t care less. Roberts expressed skepticism that the EPA would recognize when energy prices have become “exorbitant.”
The West Virginia ruling’s importance goes way beyond energy. It limits rulemaking by executive agencies or departments on any matters without express authority from Congress. “The Supreme Court gave power back to the people,” said Sen. Mitch McConnell.
Roberts reiterated that the court recently struck down the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s eviction moratorium and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s vaccine mandates for workplaces. The high court is a referee, red-flagging federal agencies’ attempts to exercise rulemaking powers way beyond what Congress gave them.
The public should be cheering. Otherwise, what unpopular rule could be next? The FDA banning high-calorie foods to combat obesity? The Department of Transportation banning gas-powered cars?
Or is the Department of Agriculture holding school-lunch subsidies hostage if school districts don’t allow transgender athletes in girls’ sports? Sorry, that last one is already happening.
The Washington Post editorial board accuses the court of judicial activism, warning the West Virginia decision sets a “new precedent to overturn all sort of rules” the justices “dislike.”
Nonsense. The justices didn’t vote for coal plants. They voted to put policy decisions of national significance in the hands of Congress, where such decisions belong.
The court says power to the people. Unfortunately, Democrats disagree.
Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York.
I say, even the Congress has zero authority to direct the States on generating their electricity.
The only thing the word democracy means to democrats is “Regime.”
This is not a democracy, stating so is another concession to the left, which RINOs are thrilled to make. The Supreme Court ruled for the Constitution, the basic high level law of our land. Starting out like that, Betsy, as a premise, nullifies your article, because it shows a huge fundamental misunderstanding.
CO2 is not a pollutant, period. No matter how many times I write it, Betsy, you will not read it or understand it.
All that corrupt coward of a RINO China Mitch cares about is becoming senate leader and retiring on top. He has no interest in power to the people. We have seen that time and time again since 2009. He had not a single time spoken out about the Biden regime strangling America’s energy. That would require him to actually speak, which he is awful at (except reciting some focus group designed speech) and it would require the coward to stick his neck out.
So you failed again in this article, trying to identify Mitch as a leader, when the real leaders are the people who filed the lawsuit. Mitch does not like people who stick their necks out.
When are the States going to stand up and tell the Federal Government to shove It? Are Governors really that scared of Traitor Joe? A handfull of Red States can bring the Federal Government to it’s Knees.
Better yet, the Oil Producing States should tell Traitor Joe to get screwed and start up unlimited Energy Production. States should Confiscate All Federal Lands within their borders and make the Federal Government pay rent!. What is Traitor Joe going to do, call out the Army? The Constitution does not give the President Control over all Production in the Nation. The Commerce Clause reserves Commerce power to the Congress and only applies to Interstate Commerce. It’s time for the Supreme Court to clip the Wings of the Commerce Clause and get the Federal Government out of the Free Market. The intent of he Commerce Clause was to expand the Free Market Place, not destroy it.
Aye, the States are sovereign, we all voluntarily joined a union, and each State agreed the Federal government would have LIMITED power. DC has grown far, far, far into an extra-constitutional size.