This Is Alex Jones’s Snarky Judge, Maya Guerra Gamble

10
7991

Alex Jones is facing a series of trials for his comments online about Sandy Hook. He used his free speech to express a foolish opinion in a country with a 1st Amendment. Jason Whitlock is confused as to how he harmed Sandy Hook parents.

The answer is he didn’t harm them. They just want to punish him for his political views.

The judge in the case is a radical leftist. Jones can’t get justice. The 1st Amendment allows people to have controversial opinions, but she rejected it as a defense.

There are several more cases coming up.

Snarky Judge Maya Guerra Gamble ordered him to pay $4.1 million to two Sandy Hook parents for his comments about Sandy Hook. The punitive damages are decided tomorrow.

Gamble was nasty and insulting to Alex Jones and everyone on his side.

Looking at some of her tweets, you can understand why she behaves as she does. The woman is a radical progressive.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Prisoner
Guest
The Prisoner
1 year ago

She’s a screwball leftist AA beneficiary. I’ve seen this so many times in corporations. We’re supposed to step aside and let them run things and not follow standards.

This case can be won on appeal. She did and said so many ridiculous things.

The parents are greedy opportunists. They have the ethical problems, not Jones.

Where did the $500 million given to build a new school go? That school would cost $25 million to build. Why did records show the school was closed years before the event?

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
1 year ago

The Government wants to silence Jones because he ask uncomfortable questions when the Government hides information and evidence.

The Prisoner
Guest
The Prisoner
1 year ago
Reply to  GuvGeek

Questions about Sandy Hook were never answered.

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
1 year ago
Reply to  The Prisoner

My Point!

General Mayhem’s Revenge
Guest
General Mayhem’s Revenge
1 year ago

Cancer must be cut out.
Both sides view the other as a cancerous tumor.
I rather doubt a reconciliation is likely.

Force Recon
Guest
Force Recon
1 year ago

This will be appealed!

8675310
Guest
8675310
1 year ago

Yeah, I think you have to prove the tort first.