Dershowitz: There Is No Client List or Sex Tapes – Update with Finnerty Grilling

This is an update confirming what Dershowitz meant when he suggested there was a client list and then said there was no client list. Finnerty grilled him on that specific issue last night. The only issue I have with Finnerty is he kept presenting what he said were facts without any evidence or specific references. We like proof.

In any case, Dersh clarified what he meant.

To clarify one point. I followed this case since I first heard about Epstein in two decades ago during his 2005 Florida trial, and I never heard a rumor of a client list. It appears Pam Bondi started it or gave it credibility.

In Bondi’s failed memo, she said the Justice Department’s “systematic review revealed no incriminating ‘client list.'” Our echo media picked up the phrase and ran with Epstein’s “long-rumored ‘client list’ a if it were fact.” The Grand Jury evidence is what we need to see.

Watch:

Update July 15

Five days ago we posted an article titled, “I know there is a client list…I know the Names,” referencing what we thought we heard from Alan Dershowitz. I think there is an error or perhaps a miscommunication in the article.

Dersh was on Sean Spicer’s show last week when he seemed to say there is a client list. It’s possible that Sean Spicer misunderstood; he led the intro when Dersh was allegedly confirming there is a client list. Perhaps Dersh just knows the names of some of the Johns involved. The reason I say all this is because during Sid and Friends this morning, Dersh said something different. In the last minute, the host asked him if he had anything else to say, and he said, “There is no client list and no sex tapes.”

IHeart’s summary: “Lastly, the lawman dismisses conspiracy theories surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, confirming there is no client list or sex tapes.”

He said the only video was in Epstein’s living room and it related to another case.

It has been cut out of the audio but they did go to a hard break which could explain that. However, the IHeart summary repeated what we heard.

Original Story

Alan Dershowitz said he has seen Jeffrey Epstein’s client list. He knows the information is being suppressed. Their files are suppressed, and Professor Dershowitz knows who the suppressors are.

If he is telling the truth, we must have this information, and President Trump is actively trying to shut this down. He wouldn’t be part of this cover-up.  However, it won’t go away. The genie is out of that bottle. I think there are many more important things than Epstein and his perv client list, but without answers, this will come back to haunt the administration into the midterms.

Dershowitz said that at least one person on the list has been accused and some of the guilty are accusers.

Professor Emeritus Dershowitz: “I have seen. This is not an opinion, this is a fact,” legal scholar Alan Dershowitz said, “I have seen it. Remember, I was accused falsely on the absence, and ultimately I was completely cleared. The woman admitted that she may have mistook me for somebody else, and withdrew all of her lawsuits.

Professor Emeritus Dershowitz: “And so from day one, from the day I was accused, I said, I want every document out, because I knew every document would prove I was innocent. So let me tell you, I know for a fact, documents are being suppressed, and they’re being suppressed to protect individuals. I know the names of the individuals. I know why they’re being suppressed. I know who’s suppressing them, but I’m bound by confidentiality from a judge and cases, and I can’t disclose what I know, but my hand to God I know, I know the names.”

Interviewer: “Without names, are these politicians, business leaders…”

Professor Emeritus Dershowitz: “Both, they’re everything. And let me tell you, a lot of them are, at least one of them is somebody who was accused. Others are accusers, and the judges have said, if somebody calls themselves a victim, a victim, we’re not going to give any information about them.

“But they may not be victims, they may be perpetrators. So we don’t have information about false accusers, and we know there have been many false accusers who have accused innocent people for money, and those records are being deliberately, willfully suppressed, and they shouldn’t be suppressed if the accusation is allowed out. So should the material that diminishes the credibility of the accuser.

“We want total transparency on this, every single document, no redaction. That’s what I’ve said from day one. I wave any of my rights to privacy, anything, there is about me. I’m happy because it will be exculpatory because I know I haven’t touched a woman other than my wife, from the day I met Jeffrey Epstein, I don’t even hug people.”