Adam Schiff’s rules for Republican witnesses are ridiculous


Shifty Adam Schiff has ridiculous questions that potential Republican witnesses will have to answer before Schiff will approve them as witnesses. Is Schiff going to reject anyone who disagrees? What is the point? According to the left-wing reporter for Politico, Kyle Cheney, it’s to keep the focus on the President and keep the hearings narrowly focused on impeachment, period.


As Jim Jordan tweeted, Republicans only have until Saturday to request witnesses for ALL open hearings. Adam Schiff decides WHICH witnesses testify if any. Schiff decides WHEN witnesses testify, if at all. The President’s counsel is still excluded. Does this sound like due process?


Meadows tweeted, “Setting aside the absurdity of these restrictions—note that the Democrats won’t even be able to stay within their own parameters. ”

“The first two witnesses they’re calling have never even talked to POTUS. They have zero firsthand knowledge. How can they speak to his motive?”


The Washington Examiner reports House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy moved Rep. Jim Jordan to the House Intel Panel ahead of the public impeachment hearings next week.

Arizona Rep. Rick Crawford is stepping aside to let Jordan do the cross-examining next Wednesday when the testimony at a House Intel Hearing on Impeachment goes public.

As this goes down, resuscitated accusations against him have oddly popped up again. The claim is that he knew about a possibly sexually abusive doctor at the college where he coached in 1994.

A lawsuit by the referee said the doctor masturbated in front of him. The timing of this lawsuit is very interesting.

Jim Jordan has denied it again.

“Congressman Jordan never saw or heard of any kind of sexual abuse, and if he had he would’ve dealt with it. Multiple investigations have confirmed this simple fact,” Jordan’s communications director Ian Fury told the Daily Caller News Foundation.



  1. The Republicans should call it for what it is, an abusive investigation without the due process. They should ask Nancy to stop it, and they should complain to the ethics commission about Schiff. The Justice Department should stop it until due process is given. The public opinion is important, people should call democrats to not vote for impeachment. Accusations without proof mean anything regarding Jordan. Why nobody can stop this sham?

    • Your strategy won’t work. Asking won’t help. House ethics is controlled by the dems. A lawsuit could help. The main help would be for republican senators Mitch, Graham, Burr and Grassley to act with aggressive hearings, but they will not, because they are part of the coup.

  2. “The government is the potent omnipresent teacher. For good or ill it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that the end justifies the means — to declare that the government may commit crimes — would bring terrible retribution.”
    ~ Justice Louis D. Brandeis
    (1856-1941) US Supreme Court Justice
    Olmstead v. United States, 277 US 438, 1928

  3. Mitch, Burr, Graham, Grassley could have broken apart the entire Schiff farce long ago. The unprecedented action by them, to not protect their President from being framed, indicates that they are part of the coup, and in cahoots with Schiff.

Leave a Reply