Bloomberg explains rich & famous need guns, not plebeians

5
465

An audience member at a town hall with Michael Bloomberg asked him if his life is more important than his. Bloomberg uses armed guards.

“How do you justify pushing for more gun control when you have an armed security detail that’s likely equipped with the same firearms and magazines that you seek to ban the common citizen from owning?” the man asked at a Monday evening Fox News town hall in Manassas, Virginia. “Does your life matter more than mine or my family’s or these peoples’?”

The audience applauded.

Bloomberg went into his usual dishonest spiel, minimizing the restrictions he wants. People should know that in New York City, people do not have Second Amendment rights unless they have already been attacked. Thank Bloomberg for that. If you shoot someone in New York, even in self-defense, they will arrest you and ask questions later.

Bloomberg “Look, I probably get 40 or 50 threats every week, ok, and some of them are real,” Bloomberg responded.”That just happens when you are the mayor of New York City or you are very wealthy, and if you are campaigning for president of the United States you get lots of threats.”

As Dana says, unless you’re rich and famous, you can’t protect yourself, you minion!

Watch:

Who is selling guns to 12-year-olds and criminals? His routine is well-practiced and untrue. It is illegal to sell guns under these circumstances if it’s a gun show or a private sale.

Bloomberg probably knows gun law. He’s a liar, and he lies with a straight face.

Watch:


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert Howard
Guest
Robert Howard
3 years ago

Shall not be infringed.” is what our constitution says about our God given right to own firearms, and Bloomberg has spent countless sums of this $$$ to infringe upon our right to own firearms.

Jen
Guest
Jen
3 years ago

Dana Loesh, who worked for Glenn Beck, is a NeverTrumper and wrote horrible tweets about the President…. my philosophy is never trust a NeverTrumper.

Enter Sandalman
Guest
Enter Sandalman
3 years ago

The second amendment is not open to interpretation. Anyone who seeks to abridge this right has sinister plans in mind.
Utopia will not commence if this right is done away with. Hands, bats, sticks, rocks, knives, tire irons, steel toed boots and more will still be available to any determined opponent.
Terminal stupidity has been reached in this republic and it won’t end well.

Thomas Moore
Guest
Thomas Moore
3 years ago

I have hoped a question would be asked; “do you politician understand that we have the 2nd amendment to protect we citizens against you the government?” Meaning we citizens are armed and ready to fire on and kill government thugs? I so hope someone will ask and then we will see the answer.

Tim Kuehl
Guest
Tim Kuehl
3 years ago
Reply to  Thomas Moore

One must be careful how that question is asked or else you will wind up in jail for threatening the thug politician you are asking the question. But of course it’s OK for them to, not only threaten you, but have the power to act on those threats and destroy you.