Blue check Democrat Ibram X. Kendi immediately thought of “white colonizers” just before Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearing.
The Barretts adopted two children from Haiti because they are generous, loving, compassionate people. They have natural children, one who has Down’s Syndrome.
Leave it to a blue check to say something very racist and get away with it.
According to Kendi’s biography on his personal website, he is quite renowned.
He wrote: KENDI is one of America’s foremost historians and leading antiracist voices. He is a National Book Award-winning and #1 New York Times bestselling author. Kendi is the Andrew W. Mellon Professor in the Humanities and the Founding Director of the Boston University Center for Antiracist Research. Kendi is a contributor writer at The Atlantic and a CBS News correspondent.
It’s scary to think he’s “one of America’s foremost historians.”
He should start looking into anti-white racists and conspiracy theories about settlers. Ibram might see himself.
HIS TWEETS
Some White colonizers “adopted” Black children. They “civilized” these “savage” children in the “superior” ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity. https://t.co/XBE9rRnoqq
— Ibram X. Kendi (@DrIbram) September 26, 2020
He was responding to this tweet:
In response to Tea Party leader Jenny Beth Martin, Kendi smeared them. Kendi got a lot of negative feedback and continued tweeting:
I’m challenging the idea that White parents of kids of color are inherently “not racist” and the bots completely change what I’m saying to “White parents of kids of color are inherently racist.” These live and fake bots are good at their propaganda. Let’s not argue with them.
— Ibram X. Kendi (@DrIbram) September 26, 2020
Actually, what most are saying is that he’s a condescending and arrogant racist.
Ibram Kendi has written that “the only way to undo racism is to constantly identify it and describe it — and then dismantle it.”
He also says “education and love are not the answer,” you have to constantly wallow in it. “Being an anti-racist requires persistent self-awareness, constant self-criticism, and regular self-examination.” You also have to be actively anti-racist or you’re a racist, baby.
He’s self-obsessed and obsessed with race.
KENDi’S ANGRY ABOUT THE BAD FEEDBACK ON TWITTER
Dear Noble Person of Color: You are an execrable cretin. It is difficult to imagine someone so singularly obsessed with racial issues. Be careful of insulting me as I outrank you BY FAR in Victimology Poker.
— Gad Saad (@GadSaad) September 27, 2020
Check out my prop and I at the MLK memorial, loser. I hope this hurts your fee-fees. pic.twitter.com/tpde1foiwN
— Nick Searcy,INTERNATIONAL FILM & TELEVISION STAR (@yesnicksearcy) September 26, 2020
“I wish those black kids had stayed in their Haitian orphanage instead of coming to America,” said the anti-racist.
— Boomieleaks (@Boomieleaks) September 26, 2020
Yes but he’s making a living out of it so has a vested interest.
— Viv S (@vivphil3) September 27, 2020
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
First, this guy’s real name is Henry Rogers. Second, his parents were rich enough to pay for his private Christian elementary school education. Last, he earned his undergraduate degree in 2005, his Master’s Degree in 2007, and his Ph.D. in 2010. Somebody funded this guy’s entire education. Talk about white privilege!!
I rather expected Trump to nominate Lagoa since she had wider support so why create a volatile situation. It then occurred to me that there must be a reason picking a person that would certainly create a stink. It can be said that Trump is quite willing to stoke the fires of the opposition. Once it became likely that she can be confirmed, the choice could be that reason. I had only caught snippets from one of his latest rallies and he said something that gives this scenario more credence. So my assumption he chose Barrett for the specific reason to cause the left to go Nuts AGAIN. After Kavanaugh, a safe choice might have kept the left silent, but this choice will have them go over the edge, to their own detriment. If that’s the case, it’s brilliant and shows he thinks well beyond the norms. It explains why he’s been so successful in so many areas, from the economy to the epidemic to peace. In each case he’s taken a completely different approach. There’s a definite concern with this. His thinking is So unique how can another President or Candidate ever be as astute in the job. It’s going to require a deep analysis of any future candidates and unfortunately there is NO ONE in the press who is capable of such analysis. The only comparable pattern I can imagine is similar to the hearings of SCOTUS nominees, that is, apart from personal attacks.