British Dark Money in US Elections on Behalf of Harris-Walz
A bombshell report by seasoned journalists Paul D. Thacker and Matt Taibbi revealed that one of The Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH’s) “annual priorities” was to “kill Musk’s Twitter” and to drain its revenue stream by shaming and harassing advertisers away from the social media platform.
The CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate in the UK is Imran Ahmed, an operative for the British government who is heavily allied with the Democratic Party. The group attacks enemies of the Democratic Party, including RFK and Elon Musk. It tried to cancel all of Musk’s advertisers.
It is foreign interference. Twenty percent of their money comes from Britain, and two board members are British.
It is a [hardcore left] Labour Party vehicle that got Starmer in power. Based on that success, they decided to bring it to the States.
1) EXCLUSIVE DOCUMENTS: Working w/ @mtaibbi we report on @CCDHate documents showing the Labour Party's political front's objective is "Kill Musk's Twitter" thru "Advertising focus" meaning harass his advertisers.
See internal documents provided by a whistleblower. pic.twitter.com/HRHbeHimAF
— Paul D. Thacker (@thackerpd) October 22, 2024
Trump’s campaign is suing the Starmer government. The Trump people are furious about it.
The Washington Post partners with dark money censorship groups like the Countering Digital Hate. The Washington Post quislings use anodyne descriptors like “the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH)” in a story targeting Musk. However, CCDH’s political ties are well-documented. They are not anodyne.
Elon Musk replied to Paul D. Thacker https://t.co/ubqpcOqlhw pic.twitter.com/6ydNtMobBy
— ELON ALERTS (@elon_alerts) November 1, 2024
-
The Importance of Prayer: How a Christian Gold Company Stands Out by Defending Americans’ Retirement
The Misinformation Academics Are Left to Very Left
It is also interesting to note that a Harvard “Misinformation Review” study found 85% of misinformation academics identified as left to very left. Only 15% were centrist or slightly right. They had 0% identifying as conservative.
A Harvard “Misinformation Review” study found 85% of misinformation academics identified as left to very left; only 15% were centrist or slighty right.
0% identified as conservative.
Why doesn’t @kakape disclose this? https://t.co/RZ3NAJhBau https://t.co/pEzdBLhAlm pic.twitter.com/7G0SA2bjiW
— Paul D. Thacker (@thackerpd) October 31, 2024
Subscribe to the Daily Newsletter
wpDiscuz
