Charlie Kirk was suspended by Twitter for stating that transgender Rachel Levine is someone who spent 54 years as a man and is now “woman of the year”. What’s wrong with that? It’s true.
Obviously, Levine can’t be “woman of the year,” and since she spent most of her life as a man, Kirk suggests it’s even more egregious.
Levine can be “transgender woman of the year,” but not a biological “woman.”
Twitter called this hateful conduct. Sticking up for women who are having their identity hijacked is now hateful.
The Left is angry that Russia is censoring social media, but they have no problem with this. It seems one-sided, don’t you think?
How is pointing out reality, in a non confrontive manner, hateful?
Serious question.. (that would likely get me banned if I was on twitter)
It’s that new world order Joe’s planning on heading!
Gee did these sensitive little snowflakes get their feelings hurt again. I guess they can only condone the hate and discontent sowed from their Marxist comrades.
let just cut his junk OFF and be done with him
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right.
George Orwell
There’s neither honesty, manhood, nor good fellowship in thee.
William Shakespeare: Henry IV (Pt 1), Act I, Scene II