Justice Roberts went on CNN to elevate the judiciary above the Executive and rationalize the judicial coup.
“So in our constitution, judges, the judiciary, is a co-equal branch of government,” Roberts said, “separate from the others, with the authority to interpret the constitution as law and strike down. Obviously, acts of Congress or acts of the president, and that innovation doesn’t work if the judiciary is not independent. It’s the job to obviously decide cases, but in the course of that, check the excesses of Congress or the executive, and that does require a degree of independence.”
If the Supreme Court were meant to be as influential as the Executive, it would have enforcement powers. They interpret the law, not create it.
Additionally, Congress is supposed to check the judiciary (Judiciary Act of 1802). Where is Congress? They could check the judiciary’s excesses.
The judiciary isn’t supposed to run the country. We didn’t vote for them.
Uh huh. And who checks the excesses of the activist Judiciary? https://t.co/vjx5NGOe0W
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) May 9, 2025
The Courts do not have jurisdiction over immigration, says Stephen Miller.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
It is pretty evident that there is a definite evidence there is a group that we know very little about, that is trying to make policy beyond their scope. We have been infested with commies and or a lot of high officials have adopted some of their teachings, look how long these institutions of higher learning, have been brainwashing young minds, longer then most of us realize. I alone off the top of my head, remember Arab organizations throwing student parties, and inviting other students to join them, and that was over thirty years ago, those students are our leaders today. Keep your powder dry, Iknow I am
roberts is a piece of TRASH!!!!!!!!!!!! Spineless CLOWN!!!!!!!!!
Judges are not God. Their authority is limited to cases that come before them where they have legal jurisdiction. Roberts is no different. He must rule on the Constitutional application of cases that come before the court.
He’s proven time and again that he’s a deep state plant and globalist activist. He is a disgrace to the court and should be removed and disbarred.
The federal district courts were created by congress and can/should be restrained by congress. The trouble is, congress is a nonfunctional entity in the United States, afraid to legislate on the one hand and determined to prevent legislation on the other. The SCOTUS is the court of final appeal but oversees the lesser courts. The trouble there is that the chief refuses to do anything that would appear to weaken the power of the court system.
No where in the law or the Constitution are district courts given the power to determine national policy, nor are they provided the authority to adjudicate disputes based upon feelings, rather than the law. This, they have arrogated unto themselves and, once again, the useless legislature has closed its eyes.
What do you want to bet that, should the legislature find its gonads and pass laws restricting the federal courts to their constitutional duties, the courts would rule that it was unconstitutional and, therefor, null and void.
SCOTUS is not supposed to interpret the Constitution; they are to decide if laws are Constitutional. They need to consult the Constitution, not prior opinions.