FB removes Candace Owen’s post although FB admits it’s factual

8
1684

Candace Owens wrote a factual, truthful, accurate statement that Facebook doesn’t like because of its context (COV vaccine). They told people who read it that it contained false information even though they told Candace it isn’t false.

Pregnant women must not be discouraged from taking the experimental non-FDA-approved drug with no long-term trials and no trials of the effects on the baby.

Facebook does not want the truth known.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wizbang
Wizbang
11 months ago

No worries. FB is free to publish or distort any and all information as it sees fit. The social media platforms are now the fourth branch of government.

John Vieira
John Vieira
5 months ago
Reply to  Wizbang

Like their ‘comrades’ in the Main sewer Stream fake Media who abandoned the journalistic principles of the Fourth Estate in favour of propagandist ‘gaslighting’ in the Fifth Column some forty years ago, the sleazy social media has jumped on their bandwagon…lies, more LIES and DAMNED LIES…Now that they HAVE a pathological lying C.I.C. these ‘Alinskyites’, as they tried to brand Trump as being like them, a liar…the REAL LIAR is being presented as a ‘truther’…anybody picked up on that yet???

Dee Dee
Dee Dee
11 months ago

It’s 1984 all over again. If you haven’t read George Orwell’s classic book “1984,” you need to. It’ll scare the pants off you. We’re living in 1984!

John Vieira
John Vieira
5 months ago
Reply to  Dee Dee

Animal Farm is another good read…

Thor
Thor
11 months ago

Wnt to take away their power? Simple…STOP USING LEFTIST CONTROLLED SOCIAL MEDIA!

Skyfall
Skyfall
11 months ago

Some young hip college students started up Fakebook to rate the “hotness” of female classmates (sexist) and there was no startup money or involvement by alphabet soup agencies.
Let me ride my rainbow unicorn over to the chocolate fountain for a refill.

GuvGeek
GuvGeek
11 months ago

230 protects Big Tech from what you put on the Internet, It does not give them protection from removing the truth – it’s time to sue Big Tech Media out of existence. I say sue them in small claims court for a defective product. If a Million people sued for say $10,000 each that would be 10,000,000,000 in damages nation wide. Fighting the suits would cost even more in lawyers. The Government should not be allowed to provide for anyone, including Government, Government Employees, or even Politicians from being sued. That is akin to putting someone or an entity out of the reach of and above the Law.

John Vieira
John Vieira
5 months ago
Reply to  GuvGeek

This would actually be terrific…Lawyers are not allowed in small claim courts…hence they WILL have to make personal appearances….