Justice Roberts intervenes again in favor of Dems & media

8

Chief Justice Roberts injected himself into the impeachment trial again on Thursday when Rand Paul tried — again — to ask a question mentioning the fraudulent whistleblower’s name, which is Eric Ciaramella.

Rand Paul sounded off during a presser:

“I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked. It makes no reference to anybody who may or may not be a whistleblower.”

“Manager Schiff says he has no knowledge. If he has no knowledge, the rest of us can have no knowledge of who the whistleblower is. The President’s team says they have no knowledge of who the whistleblower is.”

“I think it was an incorrect finding to not allow a question that makes no reference. It means that anybody that anybody ever said might have been a whistleblower could never be discussed in a proceeding. I think it’s very important whether or not a group of Democratic activists, part of the Obama-Biden administration, were working together for years looking for an opportunity to impeach the president.”

The Justice didn’t give an explanation and we deserve to know his legal basis for doing it.

This is the question:

To the Manager Schiff and counsel for the President:

Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President, are you aware that House Intelligence Committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella when at the National Security Council together, and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings?”

Paul does not in the question identify Eric Ciaramella, a CIA analyst who has been widely reported to be the “whistleblower” whose complaint launched the Democrats’ impeachment proceedings, as the “whistleblower.”

WEDNESDAY’S LYING DEBACLE

Americans should know how Adam Schiff is tied to the whistleblower since there is reasonable evidence that two of his staff members tried to oust the President since 2017. They were in league with the fake whistleblower at the time. The whistleblower, who is actually a leaker and a gossip, sparked the entire Ukraine impeach.

Also, Schiff lied about knowing him and failed to tell the public and Republicans that his staff were in contact with Ciaramella when he filed the Ukraine complaint.

SCHIFF LIES ABOUT KNOWING WHO THE WHISTLEBLOWER IS

In a question-and-answer portion of the Senate impeachment trial on Wednesday, Schiff asserted that he didn’t know who the whistleblower is and that this person was not coached in any way by a member of the House Intelligence Committee.

“Let me be clear about several things about the whistleblower. First of all, I don’t know who the whistleblower is,” the California Democrat began in response to a question from Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Jerry Moran, R-Kan., about the political bias of the whistleblower as well as any relationship with former Vice President Joe Biden.

“I haven’t met them or communicated with them in any way. The committee staff did not write the complaint or coach the whistleblower what to put in the complaint. The committee staff did not see the complaint before it was submitted to the inspector general,” he claimed.

“The committee, including its staff, did not receive the complaint until the night before,” Schiff continued. “We had an open hearing with the active [intelligence] director on September 26, more than three weeks after the legal deadline by which the committee should have received the complaint.”

Schiff also referred to the allegations of his involvement behind the scenes as a “conspiracy theory.”

Watch two clips:

Trump’s attorney Patrick Philbin discussed the ties between the whistleblower and Schiff’s staff:

PowerInbox

8 COMMENTS

  1. Maybe the question ought to be asked why Roberts is trying to protect a phony whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, by blocking an honest question that mentions his name? Is it the same reason Roberts illegally changed the wording in Obamacare to supposedly make it constitutional? Enquiring minds want to know. The whistleblower law does not protect a whistleblower’s identity, it only protects them from retaliation by their employer for revealing wrong doing. Furthermore, he’s not a whistleblower because 1, he does not have any first hand knowledge of any wrong doing. And, 2, what he claims is wrongdoing by President Trump is A, legal, and B, within the scope of President Trump’s duties and authority.

  2. Oh come on now. You know you can’t have a proper show trial if you identify, talk about, or permit questions about the accuser. This is especially true if the defendant is accused of crimes against the state.
    Now stop your bickering and get to work. Taxes are due and this trial is expensive.

  3. can SOMEONE please explain why anybody can’t say his name when Schmoozer or Nadler accidentally said the name? I don’t understand…

  4. There have been reports that schiff’s daughter dates the guy.
    These are pictures of them together with schiff and his wife

Leave a Reply