Justices Roberts & Barrett Ruled Against Texas on the Border

12
203

The far-left Justices, Justices Roberts, and Barrett just ruled against Texas, and in favor of the Biden regime’s open borders in the razor wire case.

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court just ruled that Biden can remove razor wires installed by Texas on the border. The three leftists on the Court were joined by Justices Roberts and Barrett. The Biden administration will likely seize Shelby Park from Texas and remove any border fences that were installed.

The legal argument is that the existing razor wire installed by Texas impedes the ability of the Border Patrol to apprehend those who have already crossed. The Justices went with a petty, dishonest legal argument and allowed the disaster at our border to continue.

No one is apprehending anyone, the Biden administration simply releases them. Any ruling that doesn’t back up Texas backs up the invasion. Do you agree?

Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott installed the razor wire near the Rio Grande at Eagle Pass as part of an operation to address illegal immigration.

Texas sued after Border Patrol agents cut through some of the razor wire, claiming the agents had trespassed and damaged state property.

A federal judge ruled for the Biden administration, but the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last month reversed that decision, saying agents could not cut or move the wire unless there was a medical emergency.

As Gov. DeSantis wrote on X, “Texas is trying to enforce our laws and uphold our sovereignty while the federal government is disregarding the law and ignoring its responsibility to protect our borders. What an upside-down world.”

Thank God we have the Court, right? The judicial branch wields power against Donald Trump, but not against Joe Biden.

The invasion continues.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mjw
Guest
Mjw
1 month ago

Trump had some bad advice to select Barrett. By God’s grace, T’s Garland pick didn’t hatch. As a woman, I had a sense about Barrett but can’t say it here for reasons..

Tim Kuehl
Guest
Tim Kuehl
1 month ago

It doesn’t surprise me about either of them. Roberts has a history of stabbing American citizens in the back. Among other things, he’s the one who illegally changed the wording of Obamacare from the government fining people for not participating in it to taxing people and Congress has the right to impose taxes. However, I still don’t understand how even calling it a tax is unconstitutional since it only taxed people who did not buy an approved Obamacare plan. That sounds like a violation of the 14th Amendment to me.

Rob Laity
Member
Rob Laity
1 month ago

“No State shall, without consent of Congress….engage in war, UNLESS ACTUALLY INVADED, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay”- Article I, Sec. 10, Clause 3, US Constitution.

Rob Laity
Member
Rob Laity
1 month ago
Reply to  Rob Laity

“The United States SHALL guarantee to every State in the Union a Republican form of Government, and SHALL PROTECT EACH OF THEM FROM INVASION; and…domestic violence”- Art. IV, Sec. 4

Jan
Guest
Jan
1 month ago

Time for the states to tell SCOTUS where to stick it. These two cowards are scum and always have been. If the USA will not defend it borders the state has that right. What is the state going to do about it said Andrew Jackson? What is Biden going to do?

The Prisoner
Guest
The Prisoner
1 month ago

When Barrett was selected, I wondered about how any law professor and Catholic at Notre Dame could be conservative, or Constitutional. She fulfilled my worst fears.

Notre Dame is held in high regard here in the Midwest, I never understood why.

She is no different than a Harvard or Yale Person.

Her vote on abortion lets her tell herself she is a good Catholic, while she supports national destruction, invasion, theft, rape, overdoses.

The federal government does not have the right to control the border when it is not fulfilling its stated role. The Constitution is an agreement between the states to form a union, based on certain conditions, it does not give the fed absolute power.