Lawfare Arizona: 18 Trump Advisers Indicted, Including Giuliani & Meadows

3
152

As Fani Willis flounders with her RICO case in Georgia, Arizona indicted Trump advisers, including Giuliani and Meadows. A grand jury indicted 18 advisers. Lawfare continues.

In the run-up to the next corrupt election, the Left is bankrupting everyone who dared contest the election.

It’s over efforts to “overturn the 2020 election,” WSJ reports. Actually, they contested the election. If the election is contested, you must have electors appointed or a win won’t matter.

Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes said a grand jury approved criminal charges against eleven Republicans for submitting a document to Congress falsely declaring Trump carried the battleground state.

Seven others were charged, but their names were redacted since they haven’t been served yet. The Wall Street Journal said portions of the indictment made it clear that Giuliani and Meadows were among the indicted.

In a statement, Democrat Mayes said he understood he would be criticized for not working fast enough or for conducting the investigation at all. “But as I have stated before and will say here again today, I will not allow American democracy to be undermined. It’s too important.”

Democrats are the threat to democracy.

There are similar indictments in Nevada and Michigan, thanks to Democrats.

Everything these Republicans did was above board and in the open. On December 14, 2020, the eleven people came together and signed a certificate saying they were the state’s “duly elected and qualified” electors. They documented this in a social media post and sent it to Congress and the National Archives.

Mayes said they’ve been charged with fraud, forgery, and conspiracy. It’s exactly what they are doing in the other states, and it’s BS. How can it be any of these things if it’s open and according to legal opinion?

Is Trump included? Yes, but as an unindicted co-conspirators.

Where are the Republicans?

Can’t these fools find some actual criminals to indict? They have to keep indicting these people in state after state for the same exact ‘crime?’


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Prisoner
The Prisoner
1 year ago

The USA was over in November 2020.

When crooks steal elections, such as the Arizona AG, the crooks go on the offensive, and start arresting opponents.

Felix the Cat
Felix the Cat
1 year ago

People’s justice will never tolerate dissenting views nor opinions. Unleash the People’s Courts and Inquisition!

Peter B. Prange
Peter B. Prange
1 year ago

Can’t these fools find some actual criminals to indict?”

The brilliant work of Linda Goudsmit clarifies so much. These people liver in an alternate universe, a place of their own imagination, a place of subjective reality.
We live a universe of objective reality. Here are some examples.
O.R. Borrowing creates an interest obligation that grows larger when no paid. Inflation is a near time result. Bankruptcy is an eventual result.
S.R. The ‘government’ has unlimited funds even if they are borrowed. Big banks and the government are to big to fail. Just print more money, it’s “free.”

O.R. There are people who are fundamentally evil.
S.R. Everyone is basically good, we just need to find ways for that good to express itself. Prison does not bring out the good.
O.R. People of different backgrounds and different genetics have differences. As long as we respect others, we can dialogue and perhaps each of us grow.
S.R. I am completely correct and anyone who thinks differently is a danger to be stopped.
O.R. The purpose of an election s for a majority to chose the leader for the next term.
S/R. An election is a means to maintain power. Trying to keep opponents from running (put them in prison or take away their financial resources) is necessary to keep people like me, who are always correct, in power.
O.R. There are moral absolutes.
S.R. Morals are not absolute but must change to meet my needs.
etc. etc. etc./