Longevity’s racist! No COV health benefits to older whites ‘to level the playing field’


Living longer is now racist. Academics are saying older white people shouldn’t get additional health benefits during the age of COVID so we can “level the playing field a bit.”

If you don’t believe me, read the article by Abby Goodnough and at the NY Times, titled, The Elderly vs. Essential Workers: Who Should Get the Coronavirus Vaccine First?

Harold Schmidt, an expert in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older adults, given their risks,  and that they are disproportionately minorities.

“Older populations are whiter,” Dr. Schmidt said. “Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”

Level the playing field by killing grandma?

Apparently, these same people lied when they said we had to destroy the economy to save this group — our most vulnerable.

Several blue state governors, most notably Andrew Cuomo, demanded that COV-positive older patients get shipped to nursing homes. He sent the most vulnerable to die of COV when he had the Javitts Center and the Navy hospital ship near empty. Is this why the governors did it?

It’s racist to live longer?

We also have Ezekiel Emanuel advising Joe Biden and he wants the same thing — don’t treat the elderly until we send our vaccines all over the world.

As one of my regular readers wrote, “OK, riddle me this. So, for the sake of argument, you start to accelerate the death of old white people who are going to be dead in the next five, ten, or even perhaps fifteen years. You have done basically nothing unless you start to wipe out men and mainly women of childbearing years. That said, these are the same people who believe there are 57 different genders too.”

See where we are going here?


Mr. Rothman added in two additional tweets, “This is the kind of dispassionate empiricism we’ve come to expect. Trust the science.”

”I warned you people about social justice.”

One Twitter user responded, “Ethics professors are regularly the most depraved.”

Another stated, “To what degree is ethics just the pursuit to justify instinctually immoral acts?”

This next Twitter user explained that the CDC has the same social justice viewpoint even though it would save more lives to give it to the elderly first.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
3 years ago

I suggest that the nitwits who thought this crap up be the first to volunteer for euthansia. They are obviously older than someone else. If that is the criteria, let’s make it for those who do nothing for society except flap their jaws in useless articles, or tweets, or whatever it is.
I further suggest that those in academia be lined up for early removal from the planet. They have proven they produce nothing of value. Just lots of hot air, bloviating about “…justice”, or something like that. Think of the taxpayer money which could be put to better uses if support of academia were cut off.
Oh, and they can have my shot of the ‘vaccine’. If it is anything like the ‘vaccines’ of the past, they are almost useless in having any results except for lining the pockets of the pharma folks and the medicals who promote them. Its a feel good thing for the masses. That is all.
Freedom and Liberty.

3 years ago

“They” also know that we people over 63, the ‘Baby Boomers”, are one of the last bastions of real Conservatism and Patriotism, so we need to be killed off . . . that is what they really mean by “leveling the playing field”. This election 2020 was for many of us, our “Last Hurrah”, and we will win it yet!!

The Bandit
The Bandit
3 years ago

Fundamental transformation? Blow it out your ass.
No elder in my fam is going to some end of the line nursing home.
They are just as corrupt and destroyed as everything else and the workers there are not the sharpest tools in the shed.
Remember everyone laughing at Sarah Palin when she revealed some of the Great Leap Forward rationing plans for health care/medical?
When will eating high carb or deep fried fatty foods and ingesting sugar water fructose drinks be labelled racist?
These control freaks want it all and they can fuck right off.

Tim Kuehl
Tim Kuehl
3 years ago

Let’s see, according to the Democrats, essential workers include baby killers, strippers, bartenders, casino workers, athletes, Hollywood celebrities, etc. Except communist Hollywood and professional athletes and baby killers, I have nothing against any of them and would include them as being essential as I do every employee that earns a paycheck. When your job is your income then that job is essential. It is dangerous for the politicians and bureaucrats to deem any occupation as non essential. The only way to stop it is to not pay these politicians and bureaucrats whenever any business is shut down for being non essential.

3 years ago

This is ghastly just like Hitler’s devilish schemes to play God over who lives or dies, straight the depths of HELL!!!