Nobel Prize Winner Says We Have COV All Wrong

6
9317

Professor Michael Levitt is a Professor of Structural Biology at the Stanford School of Medicine, and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for “the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems.”

He’s a numbers guy.

With a purely statistical perspective, he has been playing close attention to the Covid-19 pandemic since January. He first spoke out in February when he analyzed the numbers of cases and deaths in Hubei province he predicted with remarkable accuracy that the epidemic in that province would top out at around 3,250 deaths.

After examining outbreak after outbreak, he found there is a similar mathematical pattern. The implications are “profound.”

THERE IS NO EXPONENTIAL GROWTH [SORRY CUOMO]

The models assumed exponential growth but that hasn’t happened anywhere, even in countries that were relatively lax in their responses [except maybe New York with the two incompetent hack leaders].

South Korea, Iran, and Italy flattened the curve but the professor couldn’t believe they could do social distancing as well as China. He also observes that the total number of deaths we are seeing, in places as diverse as New York City, parts of England, parts of France, and Northern Italy, all seem to level out at a very similar fraction of the total population.

He doesn’t think they are all practicing good social distancing.

More generally, Levitt complains that epidemiologists only seem to be called wrong if they underestimate deaths, and so there is an intrinsic bias towards caution. “They see their role as scaring people into doing something, and I understand that… but in my work, if I say a number is too small and I’m wrong, or too big and I’m wrong, both of those errors are the same.”

We’re thinking of Tony, Dr. Fauci, right now.

He describes indiscriminate lockdown measures as “a huge mistake,” and advocates a “smart lockdown” policy, focused on more effective measures, focused on protecting elderly people.

THE POLICY OF HERD IMMUNITY IS THE RIGHT POLICY

I think the policy of herd immunity is the right policy. I think Britain was on exactly the right track before they were fed wrong numbers. And they made a huge mistake. I see the standout winners as Germany and Sweden. They didn’t practice too much lockdown and they got enough people sick to get some herd immunity. I see the standout losers as countries like Austria, Australia, and Israel that had very strict lockdown but didn’t have many cases. They have damaged their economies, caused massive social damage, damaged the educational year of their children, but not obtained any herd immunity.“There is no doubt in my mind, that when we come to look back on this, the damage done by lockdown will exceed any saving of lives by a huge factor.

He sees this mess as a generational mistake.

WATCH:

LET’S KEEP MAKING THE SAME MISTAKES

Meanwhile, my local NY paper, Newsday, is promoting social distancing until we get a vaccine. That would be the vaccine that is supposed to take a couple of years or will perhaps never come. It often doesn’t come and hasn’t worked for SARS or HIV.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg
Guest
Greg
3 years ago

Lockdown TV. At one point he speaks about the intuitive nature of R0. For me, the numbers didn’t add up because you have an output where the input variables are constantly changing. That didn’t make sense. Maybe it seemed obvious because of experience in computer programming. R0 means nothing when the inputs aren’t adjusted. I understood this intuitively but he explains it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl-sZdfLcEk

Greg
Guest
Greg
3 years ago

Somebody just tell her to shut her damn pie-hole.

https://twitter.com/FoxNewsSunday/status/1256935699179331585

Greg
Guest
Greg
3 years ago

Here’s another worthless Fox host. ‘This Is Not Approved’.

https://twitter.com/ShannonBream/status/1256722249975021575

Greg
Guest
Greg
3 years ago

And What’s This: Asymptomatic people do NOT spread the virus. How long, and by how many, will continue to flat-out lie to the public.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/paper-non-symptomatic-patient-transmitting-coronavirus-wrong

Greg
Guest
Greg
3 years ago

It’s sickened me to no end when Pence, Fauci and Birx all get up there and “praise” the public for doing such a good job of this damn “social distancing” and say how well it’s worked. This damn Facebook generation has fell for anyone who gives “shares” and “likes” and it’s become an addiction in and of itself, and the biggest danger to their own mental health. It’s too the point I hope Pence never makes a run for President.

Kevin Sorbo and his wife were on Fox this morning. The Fox hosts sure didn’t appreciate the comparison to the flu with the updated CDC numbers. Jason Chaffetz even dramatically changed the subject to Kevin riding a bicycle carrying golf clubs. After the segment the female host expressed her consternation over the comparison. Well, I for one am disgusted by the media hype and panic spreading segments.

CJ
Guest
CJ
3 years ago
Reply to  Greg

Absolutely concur.